Literature DB >> 6230742

The intensity of work recovery in low back pain.

G B Andersson, H O Svensson, A Odén.   

Abstract

The intensity of work recovery in LBP has been studied using the National Health Register. Nine hundred forty men, 40-47 years old, were selected randomly from the census register of the city of Göteborg, Sweden. Sickness absence data were obtained from the Health Register, in which all sickness absence from age 16 is recorded. The rate of return to work decreases as expected with an increase in absence period. Different rates were found for different diagnoses, however, with low return intensities in patients with sciatica compared with those with back pain, ie, return to work was slower in patients with sciatica. Men with manual work had a significantly longer average sickness absence than white-collar workers. The intensity of work recovery was lower in blue-collar workers during the first 20 days of absence, while the reverse was true after 20 days of sickness absence, ie, the white-collar workers who were absent more than 20 days had a slower rate of recovery than blue-collar workers who had been absent for 20 days. Data as presented here can be used to study the effect of intervention (for example, manual therapy) on the natural course of work recovery. It also can be used, as above, to study differences in sickness absence patterns between different diagnoses and work groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6230742     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198311000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

1.  Peripheral disc margin shape and internal disc derangement: imaging correlation in significantly painful discs identified at provocation lumbar discography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Pain characteristic differences between subacute and chronic back pain.

Authors:  Mona Lisa Chanda; Matthew D Alvin; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Chronic Disability Syndrome: Failing to diagnose disability can jeoparadize rehabilitation.

Authors:  B L Gamborg; W S Elliott; K W Curtis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Who retires early and why? Determinants of early retirement pension among Danish employees 57-62 years.

Authors:  Thomas Lund; Ebbe Villadsen
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2005-11-29

Review 6.  Physical ergonomics in low-back pain prevention.

Authors:  T Jones; S Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomics of chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  M J Zagari; P D Mazonson; W C Longton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? Objective assessment of trunk function.

Authors:  M Szpalski; J P Hayez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Frank J E Falco; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  'Progressive-onset' versus injury-associated discogenic low back pain: features of disc internal derangement in patients studied with provocation lumbar discography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; L M Dejohn; W E Rothfus; P C Gerszten
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 1.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.