Literature DB >> 22681741

Peripheral disc margin shape and internal disc derangement: imaging correlation in significantly painful discs identified at provocation lumbar discography.

W S Bartynski1, W E Rothfus.   

Abstract

Annular margin shape is used to characterize lumbar disc abnormality on CT/MR imaging studies. Abnormal discs also have internal derangement including annular degeneration and radial defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential correlation between disc-margin shape and annular internal derangement on post-discogram CT in significantly painful discs encountered at provocation lumbar discography (PLD). Significantly painful discs were encountered at 126 levels in 86 patients (47 male, 39 female) studied by PLD where no prior surgery had been performed and response to intradiscal lidocaine after provocation resulted in either substantial/total relief or no improvement after lidocaine administration. Post-discogram CT and discogram imaging was evaluated for disc-margin characteristics (bulge/protrusion), features of disc internal derangement (radial annular defect [RD: radial tear/fissure/annular gap], annular degeneration) and presence/absence of discographic contrast leakage. In discs with focal protrusion, 50 of 63 (79%) demonstrated Grade 3 RD with 13 (21%) demonstrating severe degenerative change only. In discs with generalized-bulge-only, 48 of 63 (76%) demonstrated degenerative change only (primarily Dallas Grade 3) with 15 of 63 (24%) demonstrating a RD (Dallas Grade 3). Differences were highly statistically significant (p<0.001). Pain elimination with intra-discal lidocaine correlated with discographic contrast leakage (p<0.001). Disc-margin shape correlates with features of internal derangement in significantly painful discs encountered at PLD. Discs with focal protrusion typically demonstrate RD while generalized bulging discs typically demonstrated degenerative changes only (p<0.001). Disc-margin shape may provide an important imaging clue to the cause of chronic discogenic low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22681741      PMCID: PMC3380404          DOI: 10.1177/159101991201800217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  31 in total

1.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D F Fardon; P C Milette
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Innervation of annulus fibrosis in low back pain.

Authors:  M H Coppes; E Marani; R T Thomeer; M Oudega; G J Groen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The value of the axial view in assessing discograms. An experimental study with cadavers.

Authors:  T Videman; A Malmivaara; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation.

Authors:  H Weber
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  N Bogduk; W Tynan; A S Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  C W Pfirrmann; A Metzdorf; M Zanetti; J Hodler; N Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Phenotypic inflammation switch in rats shown by calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive dorsal root ganglion neurons innervating the lumbar facet joints.

Authors:  S Ohtori; K Takahashi; T Chiba; M Yamagata; H Sameda; H Moriya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The intensity of work recovery in low back pain.

Authors:  G B Andersson; H O Svensson; A Odén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Dallas discogram description. A new classification of CT/discography in low-back disorders.

Authors:  B L Sachs; H Vanharanta; M A Spivey; R D Guyer; T Videman; R F Rashbaum; R G Johnson; S H Hochschuler; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Yu Chao Lee; Mario Giuseppe Tedesco Zotti; Orso Lorenzo Osti
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.