Literature DB >> 6222768

Nuclease digestibility of chromatin is affected by nuclei isolation procedures.

D A Prentice, L R Gurley.   

Abstract

Experiments using nucleases as probes of chromatin structure take place in two stages: (1) nuclei isolation, and (2) nuclease digestion. The parameters of the nuclease digestion stage are usually strictly controlled because of nuclease sensitivity to them. However, there have been no reports on whether parameters in the nuclei isolation stage affect the subsequent nuclease digestions. We have evaluated a typical nuclei isolation technique with respect to how changes in the isolation parameters affect nuclease digestion kinetics. Our observations point out that various parameters encountered in the nuclei isolation stage have a significant effect on the subsequent nuclease digestion kinetics of DNAase I. These parameters include the concentration of cells, divalent cations and phosphatase inhibitors. The pH, concentration of NaCl and concentration of detergent had little effect. Micrococcal nuclease was relatively unaffected by changes in the nuclei isolation parameters. The importance of this report lies in the demonstration that lack of control of seemingly insignificant parameters, such as cell concentration during the nuclei isolation stage, leads to subsequent irreproducible results in the DNAase I digestion. These findings indicate that great care must be exercised in the nuclei isolation stage if reproducible work is to be performed with DNAase I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6222768     DOI: 10.1016/0167-4781(83)90070-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  8 in total

1.  Nuclease sensitivity of storage-protein genes in isolated nuclei of pea seeds.

Authors:  R M Sawyer; D Boulter; J A Gatehouse
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 2.  Eukaryotic nuclear ADP-ribosylation reactions.

Authors:  J C Gaal; C K Pearson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Parameters influencing the flow cytometric analysis of DNA sensitivity to nuclease S1.

Authors:  E Prosperi; M C Giangaré; R Supino; G Bottiroli
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1990

4.  Comparison of chicken erythroid cell nuclear isolation methods using morphological, immunochemical and biochemical criteria.

Authors:  J A Briggs; M M Montiel; R C Briggs; L S Hnilica
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Selective displacement of nuclear proteins by antitumor drugs having affinity for nucleic acids.

Authors:  J Bartkowiak; J Kapuscinski; M R Melamed; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mechanism of enhanced RNA synthesis in acute-phase rat liver and its relationship to chromatin structure.

Authors:  L Schiaffonati; L Bardella; G Cairo; V Giancotti; A Bernelli-Zazzera
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1984-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  DNA stainability with base-specific fluorochromes: dependence on the DNA topology in situ.

Authors:  E Prosperi; M C Giangarè; G Bottiroli
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1994-08

8.  c-Ha-rasVal 12 oncogene-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts display more decondensed nucleosomal organization than normal fibroblasts.

Authors:  J Laitinen; L Sistonen; K Alitalo; E Hölttä
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.