Literature DB >> 2525781

Selective displacement of nuclear proteins by antitumor drugs having affinity for nucleic acids.

J Bartkowiak1, J Kapuscinski, M R Melamed, Z Darzynkiewicz.   

Abstract

The nuclear chromatin binding sites of the antitumor drugs mitoxantrone, ametantrone, doxorubicin, mithramycin, and actinomycin D and the intercalating ligand ethidium were studied by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the proteins released from rat liver nuclei in the presence and absence of these drugs in buffer of low ionic strength (10 mM NaCl). At 25-50 microM free ligand concentration, each drug produced a specific and reproducible pattern of extractable proteins of different molecular weight by (i) releasing new proteins, (ii) altering the quantity of particular extracted proteins, and/or (iii) selectively entrapping other proteins in the nuclei. Ethidium, up to 100 microM, did not affect release of proteins from the nuclei. These results indicate that each ligand either has different binding site(s) in chromatin or modulates chromatin structure in a specific way by changing the affinity of different sets of proteins for their respective binding sites, resulting in their selective extraction or entrapment. The lack of effect of ethidium indicates that intercalation of the ligand to DNA, per se, does not alter the release of nuclear proteins. If patterns of nuclear proteins selectively released or retained by antitumor drugs are found to correlate with biological activity, this type of analysis may be helpful in new drug design and screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2525781      PMCID: PMC297575          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  Nuclear proteins. III. The fibrillar nature of the nuclear matrix.

Authors:  D E Comings; T A Okada
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Structural considerations in the interaction of DNA and acridines.

Authors:  L S LERMAN
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1961-02       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Relaxation of chromatin structure by ethidium bromide binding: determined by viscometry and histone dissociation studies.

Authors:  W H Strätling; I Seidel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-11-02       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Studies of the binding of actinomycin and related compounds to DNA.

Authors:  W Müller; D M Crothers
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1968-07-28       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids.

Authors:  M J Waring
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Relaxation of chromatin structure induced by ethidium binding. Involvement of the intercalation process.

Authors:  J Paoletti
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1979-10-15

8.  Nuclease digestibility of chromatin is affected by nuclei isolation procedures.

Authors:  D A Prentice; L R Gurley
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1983-06-24

9.  Ethidium bromide as a probe of conformational heterogeneity of DNA in chromatin. The role of histone H1.

Authors:  J J Lawrence; M Daune
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-07-27       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Experimental antitumor activity of aminoanthraquinones.

Authors:  R K Johnson; R K Zee-Cheng; W W Lee; E M Acton; D W Henry; C C Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1979-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Sequence-selective binding of an ellipticine derivative to DNA.

Authors:  C Bailly; C OhUigin; C Rivalle; E Bisagni; J P Hénichart; M J Waring
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  DNA sequence specificity of mitoxantrone.

Authors:  C Panousis; D R Phillips
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Evaluation of incorporation characteristics of mitoxantrone into unilamellar liposomes and analysis of their pharmacokinetic properties, acute toxicity, and antitumor efficacy.

Authors:  R A Schwendener; H H Fiebig; M R Berger; D P Berger
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Please do not disturb: destruction of chromatin structure by supravital nucleic acid probes revealed by a novel assay of DNA-histone interaction.

Authors:  Donald Wlodkowic; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Growth responses of achlorophyllous Euglena gracilis to selected concentrations of cadmium and pentachlorophenol.

Authors:  J P Barque; A Abahamid; Y Bourezgui; H Chacun; J Bonaly
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The effect of mitoxantrone as an anticancer drug on hepatocytes nuclei and chromatin: Selective release of histone proteins.

Authors:  Zahra Hajihassan; Azra Rabbani-Chadegani
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.200

7.  Replication initiation complex formation in the absence of nuclear function in Xenopus.

Authors:  Liliana Krasinska; Daniel Fisher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Studies on the binding affinity of anticancer drug mitoxantrone to chromatin, DNA and histone proteins.

Authors:  Zahra Hajihassan; Azra Rabbani-Chadegani
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 8.410

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.