Literature DB >> 2323956

Parameters influencing the flow cytometric analysis of DNA sensitivity to nuclease S1.

E Prosperi1, M C Giangaré, R Supino, G Bottiroli.   

Abstract

Some parameters that influence the analysis in situ of DNA sensitivity to digestion with nuclease S1 have been studied in isolated HeLa nuclei with flow cytometry. DNA staining with the intercalating fluorochrome propidium iodide allowed the nucleolytic activity on double-stranded (ds) DNA to be determined by monitoring the relative reduction in nuclear fluorescence intensity. Nuclei isolated in buffer at low ionic strength in order to decondense chromatin fibres, showed a lower fluorescence intensity than nuclei with native chromatin, after digestion with nuclease S1 under identical conditions. Nuclei prepared with dispersed chromatin and digested with increasing amounts of enzyme showed a decrease in fluorescence intensity that reached a limit value at about 50% of the value of undigested control samples. On the other hand, in nuclei with native chromatin, fluorescence intensity decreased only about 18%. The NaCl concentration in the reaction buffer strongly influenced the DNA sensitivity to S1 nuclease. By increasing salt molarity from 5 mM to 200 mM, the digestion of dsDNA was significantly reduced as also shown by the amount of released nucleotides from purified calf thymus DNA. The detection of DNA sensitivity to nuclease S1, as assessed by the cytometric method, was shown to be more sensitive than a biochemical technique involving hydrolysis of purines. These results indicate that both the procedure for nuclei isolation and the digestion conditions have to be carefully controlled when evaluating in situ the presence of S1-sensitive sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2323956     DOI: 10.1007/bf00315860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochemistry        ISSN: 0301-5564


  34 in total

Review 1.  Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin.

Authors:  D S Gross; W T Garrard
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Chromatin structure. Nuclease digestion profiles reflect intermediate stages in the folding of the 30-nm fiber rather than the existence of subunit beads.

Authors:  P R Walker; M Sikorska; J F Whitfield
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Selective displacement of histone H1 from whole HeLa nuclei: effect on chromatin structure in situ as probed by micrococcal nuclease.

Authors:  G M Lawson; R D Cole
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-05-29       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  A nuclease specific for heat-denatured DNA in isolated from a product of Aspergillus oryzae.

Authors:  T Ando
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1966-01-18

5.  The histone H5 gene is flanked by S1 hypersensitive structures.

Authors:  A Ruiz-Carrillo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-08-24       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Flow cytometric evaluation of DNA digestion with S1 nuclease.

Authors:  E Prosperi; G Bottiroli; R Supino
Journal:  Basic Appl Histochem       Date:  1987

7.  Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  N Panayotatos; R D Wells
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Nuclease digestibility of chromatin is affected by nuclei isolation procedures.

Authors:  D A Prentice; L R Gurley
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1983-06-24

Review 9.  Active chromatin.

Authors:  S Weisbrod
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Characterization of a supercoil-dependent S1 sensitive site 5' to the Drosophila melanogaster hsp 26 gene.

Authors:  E Siegfried; G H Thomas; U M Bond; S C Elgin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-12-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  DNA stainability with base-specific fluorochromes: dependence on the DNA topology in situ.

Authors:  E Prosperi; M C Giangarè; G Bottiroli
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1994-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.