Literature DB >> 17428773

Biologically constrained action selection improves cognitive control in a model of the Stroop task.

Tom Stafford1, Kevin N Gurney.   

Abstract

The Stroop task is a paradigmatic psychological task for investigating stimulus conflict and the effect this has on response selection. The model of Cohen et al. (Cohen et al. 1990 Psychol. Rev. 97, 332-361) has hitherto provided the best account of performance in the Stroop task, but there remains certain key data that it fails to match. We show that this failure is due to the mechanism used to perform final response selection-one based on the diffusion model of choice behaviour (Ratcliff 1978 Psychol. Rev. 85, 59-108). We adapt the model to use a selection mechanism which is based on the putative human locus of final response selection, the basal ganglia/thalamo-cortical complex (Redgrave et al. 1999 Neuroscience 89, 1009-1023). This improves the match to the core human data and, additionally, makes it possible for the model to accommodate, in a principled way, additional mechanisms of cognitive control that enable better fits to the data. This work prompts a critique of the diffusion model as a mechanism of response selection, and the features that any response mechanism must possess to provide adaptive action selection. We conclude that the consideration of biologically constrained solutions to the action selection problem is vital to the understanding and improvement of cognitive models of response selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17428773      PMCID: PMC2440779          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  51 in total

Review 1.  The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem?

Authors:  P Redgrave; T J Prescott; K Gurney
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  Neural correlates of decisions.

Authors:  Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

Review 5.  Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions.

Authors:  G Chevalier; J M Deniau
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.

Authors:  R H Phaf; A H Van der Heijden; P T Hudson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Determinants of negative priming.

Authors:  C P May; M J Kane; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Projections from the substantia nigra pars reticulata to the motor thalamus of the rat: single axon reconstructions and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  H T Kha; D I Finkelstein; D Tomas; J Drago; D V Pow; M K Horne
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-11-05       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Introduction. Modelling natural action selection.

Authors:  Tony J Prescott; Joanna J Bryson; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Towards an executive without a homunculus: computational models of the prefrontal cortex/basal ganglia system.

Authors:  Thomas E Hazy; Michael J Frank; Randall C O'reilly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; Carsten N Boehler; Robert Won; Lauren Davis; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.

Authors:  L G Appelbaum; K L Meyerhoff; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Task-rest modulation of basal ganglia connectivity in mild to moderate Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Edith V Sullivan; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Neng C Huang; Kathleen L Poston; Helen M Bronte-Stewart; Tilman Schulte
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Additive factors do not imply discrete processing stages: a worked example using models of the stroop task.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-14

7.  The Stroop Effect Occurs at Multiple Points Along a Cascade of Control: Evidence From Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches.

Authors:  Marie T Banich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-09

8.  A neurally plausible schema-theoretic approach to modelling cognitive dysfunction and neurophysiological markers in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Andrea Caso; Richard P Cooper
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The Complex Pre-Execution Stage of Auditory Cognitive Control: ERPs Evidence from Stroop Tasks.

Authors:  Bo Yu; Xunda Wang; Lin Ma; Liang Li; Haifeng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.

Authors:  Denis O'Hora; Rick Dale; Petri T Piiroinen; Fionnuala Connolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.