Literature DB >> 6164537

Magnetic auditory evoked fields: interhemispheric asymmetry.

M Reite, J T Zimmerman, J E Zimmerman.   

Abstract

Magnetic auditory evoked fields (MAEFs) were recorded from the right (11 subjects) and the left (7 subjects) hemisphere following 128 click stimuli delivered to contralateral, ipsilateral and both (bilateral) ears. Right hemisphere MAEFs were of higher amplitude following contralateral, compared to ipsilateral, stimulation in 9 of 11 subjects; mean contralateral response amplitude was 135 +/- 33% (S.D) of ipsilateral response amplitude. Left hemisphere MAEFs were of higher amplitude following contralateral stimulation in 7 of 7 subjects; mean contralateral response amplitude was 145 +/- 44% of ipsilateral response amplitude. These observations are compatible with evidence that a majority of centripetal auditory input is crossed, and/or that contralateral auditory stimulation activates a larger area of cortex than does ipsilateral stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6164537     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90102-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  15 in total

1.  Right-hemisphere dominance for the processing of sound-source lateralization.

Authors:  J Kaiser; W Lutzenberger; H Preissl; H Ackermann; N Birbaumer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Intersession replicability of dipole parameters from three components of the auditory evoked magnetic field.

Authors:  S B Baumann; R L Rogers; A C Papanicolaou; C L Saydjari
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Spatially congruent visual motion modulates activity of the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mikhail Zvyagintsev; Andrey R Nikolaev; Heike Thönnessen; Olga Sachs; Jürgen Dammers; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory evoked fields to illusory sound source movements.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä; L McEvoy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cortical activation by monaural speech sound stimulation demonstrated by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S Hirano; Y Naito; H Okazawa; H Kojima; I Honjo; K Ishizu; Y Yenokura; Y Nagahama; H Fukuyama; J Konishi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method.

Authors:  G L Romani; S J Williamson; L Kaufman; D Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spinal and Cerebral Integration of Noxious Inputs in Left-handed Individuals.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Contra- and ipsilateral auditory stimuli produce different activation patterns at the human auditory cortex. A neuromagnetic study.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation.

Authors:  Casey S Gilmore; Brett A Clementz; Patrick Berg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Asymmetric cortical adaptation effects during alternating auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giulia Prete; Elisa Meraglia; Alberto di Domenico; Victor Lugli; Barbara Penolazzi; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.