Literature DB >> 8871103

Auditory evoked fields to illusory sound source movements.

J P Mäkelä1, L McEvoy.   

Abstract

Auditory motion can be simulated by presenting binaural sounds with time-varying interaural intensity differences. We studied the human cortical response to both the direction and the rate of illusory motion by recording the auditory evoked magnetic fields with a 122-channel whole-head neuromagnetometer. The illusion of motion from left to right, right to left, and towards and away from the subject was produced by varying a 6-dB intensity difference between the two ears in the middle of a 600-ms tone. Both the onset and the intensity transition within the stimulus elicited clear responses in auditory cortices of both hemispheres, with the strongest responses occurring about 100 ms after the stimulus and transition onsets. The transition responses were significantly earlier and larger for fast than slow shifts and larger in the hemisphere contralateral to the increase in stimulus intensity for azimuthal shifts. Transition response amplitude varied with the direction of the simulated motion, suggesting that these responses are mediated by directionally selective cells in auditory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8871103     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Auditory cortex neurons sensitive to correlates of auditory motion: underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  J M Toronchuk; E Stumpf; M S Cynader
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise.

Authors:  L K McEvoy; T W Picton; S C Champagne; A J Kellett; J B Kelly
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1990

3.  Fusion of auditory components: effects of the frequency of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  A S Bregman; R Levitan; C Liao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

4.  Neuromagnetic responses to frequency modulation of a continuous tone.

Authors:  R Hari; J P Mäkelä
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1986

5.  Amplitude of evoked responses to tones of high intensity.

Authors:  T W Picton; W S Goodman; D P Bryce
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Role of cat primary auditory cortex for sound-localization behavior.

Authors:  W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of interaural time differences on middle-latency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  L McEvoy; J P Mäkelä; M Hämäläinen; R Hari
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields: response amplitude vs. stimulus intensity.

Authors:  M Reite; J T Zimmerman; J Edrich; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-08

9.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex. Influence of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  C Elberling; C Bak; B Kofoed; J Lebech; K Saermark
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

10.  Different analysis of frequency and amplitude modulations of a continuous tone in the human auditory cortex: a neuromagnetic study.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä; R Hari; A Linnankivi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

1.  Spatially congruent visual motion modulates activity of the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mikhail Zvyagintsev; Andrey R Nikolaev; Heike Thönnessen; Olga Sachs; Jürgen Dammers; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Julia Campbell; Garrett Cardon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  Auditory object perception: A neurobiological model and prospective review.

Authors:  Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; James W Lewis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Acoustic Features and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials according to Emotional Statues of /u/, /a/, /i/ Vowels.

Authors:  Chunhyeok Kim; Seungwan Lee; Inki Jin; Jinsook Kim
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-01-05

6.  Auditory object salience: human cortical processing of non-biological action sounds and their acoustic signal attributes.

Authors:  James W Lewis; William J Talkington; Katherine C Tallaksen; Chris A Frum
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.