Literature DB >> 19449155

Spatially congruent visual motion modulates activity of the primary auditory cortex.

Mikhail Zvyagintsev1, Andrey R Nikolaev, Heike Thönnessen, Olga Sachs, Jürgen Dammers, Klaus Mathiak.   

Abstract

We investigated the brain responses to the transitions from the static to moving audiovisual stimuli using magnetoencephalography. The spatially congruent auditory and visual stimuli moved in the same direction whereas the incongruent stimuli moved in the opposite directions. Using dipole modeling we found that the static-to-moving transitions evoked a neural response in the primary auditory cortex bilaterally. The response started about 100 ms after the motion onset from a negative component (mvN1) and lasted during the entire interval of the stimulus motion. The mvN1 component was similar to the classical auditory N1 response to the static sound, but had smaller amplitude and later latency. The coordinates of the mvN1 and N1 dipoles in the primary auditory cortex were also similar. The amplitude of the auditory response to the moving stimuli appears to be sensitive to spatial congruency of the audiovisual motion; it was larger in the incongruent than congruent condition. This is evidence that the moving visual stimuli modulate the early sensory activity in the primary auditory cortex. Such early audiovisual integration may be specific for motion processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19449155     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1830-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components.

Authors:  M Neukirch; U Hegerl; R Kötitz; H Dorn; J Gallinat; W M Herrmann; U Gallinat
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.328

2.  No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

3.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: a behavioral and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Matthias Gondan; Birgit Niederhaus; Frank Rösler; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-05

5.  Neural correlates of multisensory integration of ecologically valid audiovisual events.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Causes of differences in the input-output characteristics of simultaneously recorded auditory evoked magnetic fields and potentials.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Hoke; B Lütkenhöner; K Lehnertz; J Spittka
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1986

9.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex. Influence of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  C Elberling; C Bak; B Kofoed; J Lebech; K Saermark
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981
View more
  7 in total

1.  Auditory motion direction encoding in auditory cortex and high-level visual cortex.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Felix Euler; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Wolf Singer; Axel Kohler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Attention and multisensory integration of emotions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mikhail Zvyagintsev; Carmen Parisi; Natalia Chechko; Andrey R Nikolaev; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Sounds facilitate visual motion discrimination via the enhancement of late occipital visual representations.

Authors:  Stephanie J Kayser; Marios G Philiastides; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Audio-visual interactions for motion perception in depth modulate activity in visual area V3A.

Authors:  Akitoshi Ogawa; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Emotional valence and spatial congruency differentially modulate crossmodal processing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Dhana Wolf; Lisa Schock; Saurabh Bhavsar; Liliana R Demenescu; Walter Sturm; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Spatiotemporal Processing in Crossmodal Interactions for Perception of the External World: A Review.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22

7.  Perceived Conventionality in Co-speech Gestures Involves the Fronto-Temporal Language Network.

Authors:  Dhana Wolf; Linn-Marlen Rekittke; Irene Mittelberg; Martin Klasen; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.