Literature DB >> 6159189

Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimate.

P K Wong, R G Bickford.   

Abstract

One of the main difficulties with the interpretation of evoked potential data is the question of how much noise is contained within the average. This question is crucial in deciding whether any particular peak component is a genuine signal, or whether it is a random occurrence due to noise. This is particularly crucial in abnormal cases, and with stimuli near sensory threshold. A simple method is described which allows on-line objective statistical determination of the presence of significant non-random peak components. It is shown that high signal-to-noise (S/N) estimates are seen with 'clean' and reproducible BAEPs and low S/N estimates are seen with poorly reproducible BAEPs. This provides an objective measure to judge the acceptability of any single BAEP, or to indicate that further averaging is required. The effect of noise on wave shape and peak latency is discussed. This can be quite marked, with gross distrotion of morphology and latency as a result. The technique lends itself to evoked response audiometry (ERA) and sensory threshold determination. Further, it can be applied to evoked potentials from other stimulus modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6159189     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90320-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

1.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Standardized measurement error: A universal metric of data quality for averaged event-related potentials.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Andrew X Stewart; Aaron Matthew Simmons; Mijke Rhemtulla
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Mingxing Zhu; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Xiaochen Wang; Haoshi Zhang; Junjie Yao; Yun Lu; Mingjiang Wang; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay; Wanqing Wu; Shixiong Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.