Literature DB >> 33782996

Standardized measurement error: A universal metric of data quality for averaged event-related potentials.

Steven J Luck1,2, Andrew X Stewart1, Aaron Matthew Simmons1, Mijke Rhemtulla2.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) can be very noisy, and yet, there is no widely accepted metric of ERP data quality. Here, we propose a universal measure of data quality for ERP research-the standardized measurement error (SME)-which is a special case of the standard error of measurement. Whereas some existing metrics provide a generic quantification of the noise level, the SME quantifies the data quality (precision) for the specific amplitude or latency value being measured in a given study (e.g., the peak latency of the P3 wave). It can be applied to virtually any value that is derived from averaged ERP waveforms, making it a universal measure of data quality. In addition, the SME quantifies the data quality for each individual participant, making it possible to identify participants with low-quality data and "bad" channels. When appropriately aggregated across individuals, SME values can be used to quantify the combined impact of the single-trial EEG noise and the number of trials being averaged together on the effect size and statistical power in a given experiment. If SME values were regularly included in published articles, researchers could identify the recording and analysis procedures that produce the highest data quality, which could ultimately lead to increased effect sizes and greater replicability across the field.
© 2021 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; effect size; reliability; replicability; signal-to-noise ratio; statistical power

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33782996      PMCID: PMC8169536          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.348


  18 in total

1.  Reliability of error-related brain activity.

Authors:  Doreen M Olvet; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Kara Morgan-Short; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Data quality and reliability metrics for event-related potentials (ERPs): The utility of subject-level reliability.

Authors:  Peter E Clayson; C J Brush; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Assessing the internal consistency of the event-related potential: An example analysis.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; Emily S Kappenman; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Accounting for stimulus and participant effects in event-related potential analyses to increase the replicability of studies.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki; Jaromil Frossard; Olivier Renaud
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Steven J Luck; Jaclyn L Farrens; Emily S Kappenman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Using trial-level data and multilevel modeling to investigate within-task change in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Edgar C Merkle; Meredith P Levsen; Tiffany A Ito; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Calderon; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

10.  Filter-Based Phase Shifts Distort Neuronal Timing Information.

Authors:  Dorin Yael; Jacob J Vecht; Izhar Bar-Gad
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-04-19
View more
  11 in total

1.  Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the P3 event-related potential (ERP) elicited by alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage pictures.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Thomas M Piasecki; Greg Hajcak; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Peak selection and latency jitter correction in developmental event-related potentials.

Authors:  Maggie W Guy; Stefania Conte; Aslı Bursalıoğlu; John E Richards
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  Win, lose, or draw: Examining salience, reward memory, and depression with the reward positivity.

Authors:  Nathan M Hager; Matt R Judah; Eric Rawls
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Mental chronometry in big noisy data.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; Fariba Sharifian; Marie Gutberlet; Daniel Schneider; Stephan Getzmann; Stefan Arnau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Electrophysiological Markers of Fairness and Selfishness Revealed by a Combination of Dictator and Ultimatum Games.

Authors:  Ali M Miraghaie; Hamidreza Pouretemad; Alessandro E P Villa; Mohammad A Mazaheri; Reza Khosrowabadi; Alessandra Lintas
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-09

6.  Interaction of prior category knowledge and novel statistical patterns during visual search for real-world objects.

Authors:  Austin Moon; Jiaying Zhao; Megan A K Peters; Rachel Wu
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-04

7.  When multiplying is meaningful in memory: Electrophysiological signature of the problem size effect in children.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Amandine E Grenier; Bianca O Obinyan; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2022-02-26

8.  Neuroscience from the comfort of your home: Repeated, self-administered wireless dry EEG measures brain function with high fidelity.

Authors:  Florentine M Barbey; Francesca R Farina; Alison R Buick; Lena Danyeli; John F Dyer; Md Nurul Islam; Marina Krylova; Brian Murphy; Hugh Nolan; Laura M Rueda-Delgado; Martin Walter; Robert Whelan
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-29

9.  Neural specialization to human faces at the age of 7 months.

Authors:  Santeri Yrttiaho; Anneli Kylliäinen; Tiina Parviainen; Mikko J Peltola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  A Preliminary Study Characterizing Subcortical and Cortical Auditory Processing and Their Relation to Autistic Traits and Sensory Features.

Authors:  Erin S M Matsuba; Beth A Prieve; Emily Cary; Devon Pacheco; Angela Madrid; Elizabeth McKernan; Elizabeth Kaplan-Kahn; Natalie Russo
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.