Literature DB >> 559675

New prospects for a prolonged functional life-span of artificial hip joints by using the material combination polyethylene/aluminium oxide ceramin/metal.

M Semlitsch, M Lehmann, H Weber, E Doerre, H G Willert.   

Abstract

Investigations over the years have shown that the mirror-finished Al2O3 ceramic is a much more suitable frictional counterpart to ultrahigh molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene than metal. Despite the extremely gread hardness difference between polyethylene and Al2O3 ceramic, a considerable lower wear rate is obtained for the polyethylene socked with this new low-friction material combination. The unexpectedly favorable tribological behavior of this ceramic material in contact with polyethylene may be attributed to the following factors: better values for corrosion resistance characteristics, wettability with liquids, surfact gloss, hardness, and scratch resistance of the ceramic material in comparison with those of the hitherto used metallic implant materials (AISI-316L steel or cast Co-Cr-Mo alloy). It appears that, by using this new combination of materials for the socket and the ball, it will be possible to prolong the service life of artificial hip joints considerably without having effecy any fundamental changes in the present design and implantation principle retaining the hitherto used anchorage shaft made of wrought Co-Ni-Cr-Mo-Ti alloy Protasul-10 of extremely high corrosion fatigue strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 559675     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820110409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  13 in total

1.  Clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament retaining TKA with alumina ceramic condylar prosthesis: comparison to Co-Cr alloy prosthesis.

Authors:  Tokifumi Majima; Kazunori Yasuda; Hidenobu Tago; Yoshimitu Aoki; Akio Minami
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Ceramic on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip replacement: any better than metal on crosslinked polyethylene?

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

3.  Implant materials for hip endoprostheses: old proofs and new trends.

Authors:  M Semlitsch; H G Willert
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Five years experience with ceramic-metal-composite hip endoprostheses. I. clinical evaluation.

Authors:  P Griss; G Heimke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1981

5.  [What is the significance of calcar resorption after total hip replacement (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Griss; G Heimke; E Werner; J Bleicher; G Jentschura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1978-10-27

6.  [Pathological findings in tissue surrounding revised metal/metal articulations].

Authors:  W Baur; W Hönle; H-G Willert; A Schuh
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?

Authors:  Guy Cafri; Elizabeth W Paxton; Rebecca Love; Stefano A Bini; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  How safe are ceramic heads as hip endoprostheses? A series of three head fractures within 3 months.

Authors:  A Burckhardt; C Berberat
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  [Fracture of the ceramic head in total hip prosthesis. Apropos of 2 cases].

Authors:  P Mangione; X Pascarel; B Vinciguerra; J L Honton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Long-term durability of alumina ceramic heads in THA.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Tobias Gotterbarm; Moritz M Innmann; Christian Merle; Thomas Bruckner; J Philippe Kretzer; Marcus R Streit
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.