Literature DB >> 554724

Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings.

W N Charman.   

Abstract

While sinusoidal grating stimuli are finding increasing application in clinical tests for visual disturbance, the possible effects on the test results of simple defocus of the retinal image, due to refractive or accommodative error, are not always acknowledged. Theoretical considerations and experimental measurements emphasize that the degradation in visual performance due to such defocus effects is minimal when the eye pupil is small and the spatial frequency of the grating test objects is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 554724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0007-1218


  11 in total

1.  Senescence of the temporal impulse response to a luminous pulse.

Authors:  Keizo Shinomori; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Are normally sighted, visually impaired, and blind pedestrians accurate and reliable at making street crossing decisions?

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Samuel H Jarvis; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Temporal presentation protocols in stereoscopic displays: Flicker visibility, perceived motion, and perceived depth.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Vasiliy I Karasev; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.140

6.  Early age-related macular degeneration impairs tolerance to stimulus degradation.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Janis White
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Monocular diplopia due to spherocylindrical refractive errors (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Steven M Archer
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

8.  Measuring contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Monocular blur alters the tuning characteristics of stereopsis for spatial frequency and size.

Authors:  Roger W Li; Kayee So; Thomas H Wu; Ashley P Craven; Truyet T Tran; Kevin M Gustafson; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance.

Authors:  Julia S Benoit; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.