Literature DB >> 18427616

Monocular diplopia due to spherocylindrical refractive errors (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Steven M Archer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ordinary spherocylindrical refractive errors have been recognized as a cause of monocular diplopia for over a century, yet explanation of this phenomenon using geometrical optics has remained problematic. This study tests the hypothesis that the diffraction theory treatment of refractive errors will provide a more satisfactory explanation of monocular diplopia.
METHODS: Diffraction theory calculations were carried out for modulation transfer functions, point spread functions, and line spread functions under conditions of defocus, astigmatism, and mixed spherocylindrical refractive errors. Defocused photographs of inked and projected black lines were made to demonstrate the predicted consequences of the theoretical calculations.
RESULTS: For certain amounts of defocus, line spread functions resulting from spherical defocus are predicted to have a bimodal intensity distribution that could provide the basis for diplopia with line targets. Multimodal intensity distributions are predicted in point spread functions and provide a basis for diplopia or polyopia of point targets under conditions of astigmatism. The predicted doubling effect is evident in defocused photographs of black lines, but the effect is not as robust as the subjective experience of monocular diplopia.
CONCLUSIONS: Monocular diplopia due to ordinary refractive errors can be predicted from diffraction theory. Higher-order aberrations--such as spherical aberration--are not necessary but may, under some circumstances, enhance the features of monocular diplopia. The physical basis for monocular diplopia is relatively subtle, and enhancement by neural processing is probably needed to account for the robustness of the percept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18427616      PMCID: PMC2258122     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  65 in total

1.  Correlation between optical and psychophysical parameters as a function of defocus.

Authors:  Eloy A Villegas; Concepción González; Bernard Bourdoncle; Thierry Bonnin; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A statistical model of the aberration structure of normal, well-corrected eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Xin Hong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A unique case of double monocular diplopia.

Authors:  M W MORGAN
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1955-02

4.  The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating.

Authors:  G Walsh; W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Reliable measurements from fundus photographs in the presence of focusing errors.

Authors:  H Heier; O Brinchmann-Hansen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Monocular diplopia of retinal origin.

Authors:  F E Lepore; D L Yarian
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1986-09

7.  MTF of the defocused optical system of the human eye for incoherent monochromatic light.

Authors:  L J Bour
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-03

8.  Pupil size and visual resolution.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Monocular diplopia caused by ocular aberrations and hyperopic defocus.

Authors:  R L Woods; A Bradley; D A Atchison
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.