Literature DB >> 5494897

Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats.

M Terman.   

Abstract

Rats were trained to press one of two keys when a standard intensity value of a 4.0-kHz sine tone (70 or 100 db re 2 x 10(-4) microbar) was presented from a centrally located loudspeaker. Pressing the other key was reinforced when comparison intensity values (as much as 30 db less than the standard value) were presented. The animals initiated tone presentations by breaking a light beam at the rear of the chamber. Correct choices produced brain-stimulation reinforcement, and errors produced a timeout. A procedure designed by Jenkins was used to partial out choice data under potential control of sequential cues in the stimulus series. When the standard-comparison intensity difference was varied, the rats showed similar psychometric functions despite wide differences in response bias (relative position preference). A signal detection analysis showed that response biases for individual animals remained fairly consistent during psychophysical testing. The trend of decreasing choice accuracy at small intensity differences was described by the cumulative normal probability function. The similarity of psychometric functions obtained with 70- and 100-db standards supported Weber's law. There was some evidence that response latencies were controlled by intensity differences even when choice behavior was undifferentiated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1970        PMID: 5494897      PMCID: PMC1333756          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

2.  The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum.

Authors:  D H LAWRENCE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1952-12

3.  Perceptual organization in the rat.

Authors:  D C TEAS; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-03       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The nature of the response in discrimination learning.

Authors:  K W SPENCE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks.

Authors:  B J Fellows
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Comparison of three methods for obtaining psychophysical thresholds from the pigeon.

Authors:  T L Mentzer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

8.  A comparison of two psychophysical methods using animals.

Authors:  H Moskowitz; L Kitzes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Discrimination of brightness differences by rats with food or brain-stimulation reinforcement.

Authors:  M Terman; J W Kling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats.

Authors:  M Terman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  17 in total

1.  Response bias and the discrimination of stimulus duration.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R Demello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Duration discrimination: effects of probability of stimulus presentation.

Authors:  T F Elsmore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discriminability of fixed-ratio schedules for pigeons: effects of absolute ratio size.

Authors:  S L Hobson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auditory word discriminations in the pigeon.

Authors:  R Pisacreta; D Gough; E Redwood; L Goodfellow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Latency differentiation of hits and false alarms in an operant-psychophysical test.

Authors:  M Terman; J S Terman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Detection of brief tones in noise by rats.

Authors:  R J Irwin; M Terman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The visual acuity of the pigeon for distant targets.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Comparison of yes-no and latency measures of auditory intensity discrimination.

Authors:  M Green; M Terman; J S Terman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the discriminability of stimulus duration.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.