Literature DB >> 515692

High-frequency audiometry. Age and sex variations.

D Osterhammel, P Osterhammel.   

Abstract

286 normal subject representing both sexes and seven age groups from 10 to greater than or equal to 70 years were tested with both conventional pure tone audiometry and high frequency audiometry (4--20 kHz) using a previously described free field system. The subjects were selected according to very strict criteria. Results from conventional audiometry are similar to other findings in presbycusis studies, though sex difference was seen for the oldest age groups, but only at the frequencies 4 and 5 kHz where the male population showed a significantly poorer hearing. The same sex difference was observed by high frequency audiometry at 4 and 8 kHz. From 10--20 kHz no sex difference was present. At the high frequencies there is an abrupt decrease in hearing sensitivity already from youth. Hitherto, no international standard for zero dB hearing level exists for frequencies above 8 kHz. It is questioned whether a general standard is meaningful at all and that normative data for various age groups should instead be used as a reference level.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 515692     DOI: 10.3109/01050397909076304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  14 in total

1.  Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Bethany Plakke; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  High-frequency hearing thresholds: effects of age, occupational ultrasound and noise exposure.

Authors:  Isabella Maccà; Maria Luisa Scapellato; Mariella Carrieri; Stefano Maso; Andrea Trevisan; Giovanni Battista Bartolucci
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cumulative and acute toxicity of repeated high-dose tobramycin treatment in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  S S Pedersen; T Jensen; D Osterhammel; P Osterhammel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Developmental trends in the interaction between auditory and linguistic processing.

Authors:  S Jerger; F Pirozzolo; J Jerger; R Elizondo; S Desai; E Wright; R Reynosa
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

6.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  In search of the DFNA11 myosin VIIA low- and mid-frequency auditory genetic modifier.

Authors:  Jeremy C Kallman; James O Phillips; Naomi F Bramhall; John P Kelly; Valerie A Street
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Clinical Utilisation of High-frequency DPOAEs.

Authors:  Gayla Poling; Jungmee Lee; Jonathan Siegel; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  ENT Audiol News       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

9.  Influence of different kinds of noise on the ear and some physiological and psychological parameters.

Authors:  R Bartsch; C Brückner; H G Dieroff
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Christopher Spankovich; Edward Lobariñas; Scott K Griffiths
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.