PURPOSE: It has been suggested that high-frequency audiometry (HFA) could represent a useful preventive measure in exposed workers. The aim was to investigate the effects of age, ultrasound and noise on high-frequency hearing thresholds. METHODS: We tested 24 industrial ultrasound-exposed subjects, 113 industrial noise-exposed subjects and 148 non-exposed subjects. Each subject was tested with both conventional-frequency (0.125-8 kHz) and high-frequency (9-18 kHz) audiometry. RESULTS: The hearing threshold at high frequency deteriorated as a function of age, especially in subjects more than 30 years old. The ultrasound-exposed subjects had significantly higher hearing thresholds than the non-exposed ones at the high frequencies, being greatest from 10 to 14 kHz. This hearing loss was already significantly evident in subjects with exposure <5 years and increased with years of exposure and advancing age. The noise exposure group had significantly higher hearing thresholds than the non-exposed group at the conventional frequencies 4 and 6 kHz and at the high frequency of 14 kHz. After stratification for age, there was a significant difference between the two groups at 9-10 and 14-15 kHz only for those under 30 years of age. CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis indicated that age was the primary predictor, and noise and ultrasound exposure the secondary predictors of hearing thresholds in the high-frequency range. The results suggest that HFA could be useful in the early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss in younger groups of workers (under 30 years of age).
PURPOSE: It has been suggested that high-frequency audiometry (HFA) could represent a useful preventive measure in exposed workers. The aim was to investigate the effects of age, ultrasound and noise on high-frequency hearing thresholds. METHODS: We tested 24 industrial ultrasound-exposed subjects, 113 industrial noise-exposed subjects and 148 non-exposed subjects. Each subject was tested with both conventional-frequency (0.125-8 kHz) and high-frequency (9-18 kHz) audiometry. RESULTS: The hearing threshold at high frequency deteriorated as a function of age, especially in subjects more than 30 years old. The ultrasound-exposed subjects had significantly higher hearing thresholds than the non-exposed ones at the high frequencies, being greatest from 10 to 14 kHz. This hearing loss was already significantly evident in subjects with exposure <5 years and increased with years of exposure and advancing age. The noise exposure group had significantly higher hearing thresholds than the non-exposed group at the conventional frequencies 4 and 6 kHz and at the high frequency of 14 kHz. After stratification for age, there was a significant difference between the two groups at 9-10 and 14-15 kHz only for those under 30 years of age. CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis indicated that age was the primary predictor, and noise and ultrasound exposure the secondary predictors of hearing thresholds in the high-frequency range. The results suggest that HFA could be useful in the early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss in younger groups of workers (under 30 years of age).
Authors: Giuseppina Somma; Antonio Pietroiusti; Andrea Magrini; Luca Coppeta; Carla Ancona; Stefano Gardi; Marco Messina; Antonio Bergamaschi Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Nyssa F Farrell; Samuel P Gubbels; Daniel J Tollin Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Israel P Nyarubeli; Alexander M Tungu; Bente E Moen; Magne Bråtveit Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michael Dierickx; Suzanne Verschraegen; Els Wierinck; Guy Willems; Astrid van Wieringen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Eva Mrázková; Martina Kovalová; Zdeněk Čada; Nikol Gottfriedová; Tomáš Rychlý; Michaela Škerková Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rory J Lubner; Neil S Kondamuri; Renata M Knoll; Bryan K Ward; Philip D Littlefield; Derek Rodgers; Kalil G Abdullah; Aaron K Remenschneider; Elliott D Kozin Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 4.003