Literature DB >> 26236463

Clinical Utilisation of High-frequency DPOAEs.

Gayla Poling, Jungmee Lee, Jonathan Siegel, Sumitrajit Dhar.   

Abstract

The value of assessing auditory function at frequencies above 8kHz to detect age-related changes and ototoxic damage in the cochlea is well established but not commonplace. Physiological changes in the auditory periphery due to age and ototoxicity are initially evident, and most prominent, at frequencies above 8kHz [1]. The most well investigated use of hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions above 8kHz is in monitoring auditory function in patients undergoing chemotherapy [2]. Ototoxic changes in hearing thresholds at frequencies between 10-14kHz prior to the manifestation of any changes at lower frequencies have been consistently documented in these patients. Age-related changes in hearing also appear at frequencies above 8kHz prior to any observable changes at regular audiometric frequencies [3]. The value of using hearing thresholds at frequencies above 8kHz to detect noise-induced hearing loss is debated in the literature with some reports of hearing thresholds at frequencies above 8kHz demonstrating more sensitivity to noise-induced damage than others [4].

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 26236463      PMCID: PMC4519839     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ENT Audiol News        ISSN: 2042-2156


  15 in total

1.  Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses.

Authors:  P A Dorn; P Piskorski; M P Gorga; S T Neely; D H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  High-frequency (10-18 kHz) hearing thresholds: reliability, and effects of age and occupational noise exposure.

Authors:  H O Ahmed; J H Dennis; O Badran; M Ismail; S G Ballal; A Ashoor; D Jerwood
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.611

3.  Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal.

Authors:  S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  High-frequency audiometry. Age and sex variations.

Authors:  D Osterhammel; P Osterhammel
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1979

6.  Extended high-frequency audiometry. Air- and bone-conduction thresholds, age and gender variations.

Authors:  P Hallmo; A Sundby; I W Mair
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1994

7.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

8.  Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Laura Elizabeth Dreisbach; Kelly Melissa Long; Shannon Elizabeth Lees
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; David S Phillips; Stephen A Fausti; Jane S Gordon; Wendy J Helt; Debra Wilmington; Gene W Bratt; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of ABR stimuli for the early detection of ototoxicity: conventional clicks compared with high frequency clicks and single frequency tonebursts.

Authors:  Stephen A Fausti; Christopher L Flick; Alison M Bobal; Roger M Ellingson; James A Henry; Curtin R Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.