Literature DB >> 512570

Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection.

D McCarthy, M Davison.   

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained to detect differences in light intensity. Two stimuli, S1 and S2, differing in intensity, were arranged on the center key of a three-key chamber according to set probabilities. A peck on the center key turned on the two side keys. When S1 was presented on the center key, a peck on the left key was "correct" and when S2 was presented, a peck on the right key was "correct." Correct responses produced reinforcement and incorrect responses produced 3-second blackout. Detection performance was measured under three procedures. The first was a standard signal-detection design in which the probability of S1 was varied and the number of reinforcements obtained for correct responses to S1 was allowed to covary. In the second procedure, the probability of S1 was again varied but the distribution of reinforcements between the two choices was kept equal. In the third procedure, probability of S1 was held constant while the distribution of reinforcements was varied between the two choices. Changes in response bias were a function of variations in the relative reinforcement ratio for the choice responses and not a function of variations in the probability of stimulus presentation. Discriminability remained constant across the three procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 512570      PMCID: PMC1332978          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response bias and the discrimination of stimulus duration.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Bias functions and operating characteristics of rats discriminating auditory stimuli.

Authors:  A L Hume; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  49 in total

1.  Effects of response disparity on stimulus and reinforcer control in human detection tasks.

Authors:  S Gallagher; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Dopamine-related deficit in reward learning after catecholamine depletion in unmedicated, remitted subjects with bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Simona Grob; Diego A Pizzagalli; Sunny J Dutra; Jair Stern; Hanspeter Mörgeli; Gabriella Milos; Ulrich Schnyder; Gregor Hasler
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Signal-detection analyses of conditional discrimination and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Types of responding in a signal-detection task.

Authors:  B Alsop; R Rowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delayed reinforcement and delayed choice in symbolic matching to sample: Effects on stimulus discriminability.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Bias in self-evaluation: Signal probability effects.

Authors:  T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Stimulus effects on concurrent performance in transition.

Authors:  E S Hanna; D E Blackman; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reduced reward learning predicts outcome in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Elske Vrieze; Diego A Pizzagalli; Koen Demyttenaere; Titia Hompes; Pascal Sienaert; Peter de Boer; Mark Schmidt; Stephan Claes
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.