Literature DB >> 11394486

Effects of response disparity on stimulus and reinforcer control in human detection tasks.

S Gallagher1, B Alsop.   

Abstract

In two detection experiments, university students reported whether the second of two sequentially presented tones was longer or shorter than the first by responding to stimuli presented on a touch screen. Stimulus disparity and response disparity were manipulated to compare their effects on measures of discrimination and response bias when the reinforcement ratio for correct responses was asymmetric. Choice stimuli consisted of squares filled with different pixel densities. Response disparity was manipulated by varying the difference in density between the two choice stimuli. In both experiments, decreasing stimulus disparity reduced discrimination but had no consistent effect on bias. Decreasing response disparity also reduced discrimination in both experiments, and often reduced estimates of bias. The effects of response disparity on bias were most clear in Experiment 2, in which a greater overall level of response disparity was arranged. The data show that, like corresponding research with pigeons, detection performance of human subjects can be conceptualized as discriminated operants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394486      PMCID: PMC1284814          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  26 in total

1.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

Review 6.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Subjective shortening in humans' memory for stimulus duration.

Authors:  J H Wearden; A Ferrara
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1993-05

9.  Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection.

Authors:  J A Nevin; P Jenkins; S Whittaker; P Yarensky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Towards a behavioral theory of bias in signal detection.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Memory research in the southernmost psychology department.

Authors:  Elaine Reese; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-10-26

Review 2.  Stimulus Control Research and Practice: Considerations of Stimulus Disparity and Salience for Discrimination Training.

Authors:  Mary E Halbur; R Kyle Caldwell; Tiffany Kodak
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Shawn P Gilroy; Toshikazu Kuroda; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.