Literature DB >> 16812809

Types of responding in a signal-detection task.

B Alsop, R Rowley.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained to discriminate between two line orientations in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. The distribution of reinforcers for the two types of correct response was varied across conditions. Performance on each trial was recorded separately, including the time taken to make a choice response. Discriminability and response-bias measures were calculated for overall performance, and, following a median split of the data from each condition, for faster and slower choice responses in each condition. Discriminability between the stimuli did not vary systematically as a function of choice latency. Variations of the reinforcer distributions produced larger response biases for the faster responses than for the slower responses. Responses on trials following reinforcers were faster and showed a greater effect of the reinforcer distribution than did other responses. Behavioral models of signal detection should consider the speed of the choice response as a factor modulating the effects of reinforcer distributions.

Year:  1996        PMID: 16812809      PMCID: PMC1349952          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reaction times of pigeons on a wavelength discrimination task.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance.

Authors:  J A Nevin; H Cate; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Sample-stimulus discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  B M Jones; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Isobias and alloiobias functions in animal psycophysics.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1984-07

10.  Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.

Authors:  R E DeLong; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.