Literature DB >> 5121854

On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.

A J Ernst, L Engberg, D R Thomas.   

Abstract

Twelve pigeons were given successive discrimination training involving variable-interval reinforcement for key pecking in the presence of one intensity of monochromatic light randomly alternated with extinction for pecking during another intensity. All of the pigeons were then tested in extinction for generalization along the intensity dimension, and all showed a displacement of maximal responding from the positive stimulus in the direction opposite the negative stimulus. For six of the pigeons, for which the test included only three values beyond the positive stimulus, four showed peaked gradients but two did not, showing monotonic gradients with maximal responding to the most extreme test value. For another six pigeons tested over a wider range, all showed peaked gradients. Thus, when a sufficiently wide range of test values is employed, generalization gradients for visual intensity have the same peaked form as do gradients for qualitative visual dimensions such as wavelength or line angle.

Mesh:

Year:  1971        PMID: 5121854      PMCID: PMC1333864          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-07

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Generalization of auditory intensity following discrimination training.

Authors:  R PIERREL; J G SHERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus control in pigeons based on proprioceptive stimuli from floor inclination.

Authors:  D C Riccio; M Urda; D R Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A peak shift on a line-tilt continuum.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  A comparison of generalization functions and frame of reference effects in different training paradigms.

Authors:  D R Thomas; M Lusky; S Morrison
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

2.  Peak shift following simultaneous discriminations.

Authors:  A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice, time allocation, and response rate during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  C Mandell; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the development of stimulus control.

Authors:  E G Heinemann; E Avin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Differentiation of the intensity of photic stimuli.

Authors:  M F Polivannaya; L S Rytikova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb

7.  Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.

Authors:  D M Dougherty; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.