Literature DB >> 1940765

Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.

D M Dougherty1, P Lewis.   

Abstract

Using horses, we investigated three aspects of the stimulus control of lever-pressing behavior: stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift. Nine solid black circles, ranging in size from 0.5 in. to 4.5 in. (1.3 cm to 11.4 cm) served as stimuli. Each horse was shaped, using successive approximations, to press a rat lever with its lip in the presence of a positive stimulus, the 2.5-in. (6.4-cm) circle. Shaping proceeded quickly and was comparable to that of other laboratory organisms. After responding was maintained on a variable-interval 30-s schedule, stimulus generalization gradients were collected from 2 horses prior to discrimination training. During discrimination training, grain followed lever presses in the presence of a positive stimulus (a 2.5-in circle) and never followed lever presses in the presence of a negative stimulus (a 1.5-in. [3.8-cm] circle). Three horses met a criterion of zero responses to the negative stimulus in fewer than 15 sessions. Horses given stimulus generalization testing prior to discrimination training produced symmetrical gradients; horses given discrimination training prior to generalization testing produced asymmetrical gradients. The peak of these gradients shifted away from the negative stimulus. These results are consistent with discrimination, stimulus generalization, and peak-shift phenomena observed in other organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1940765      PMCID: PMC1323085          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  26 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG A LIGHT FLICKER RATE CONTINUUM AFTER DISCRIMINATION TRAINING WITH SEVERAL S-'S.

Authors:  H N SLOANE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization and preference on a stimulus-intensity continuum.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Operant responding in a horse under several schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  R D MYERS; D C MESKER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relationship between discriminability and generalization: a revaluation.

Authors:  H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-06

6.  Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  B Migler; J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Further evidence of a sensory-tonic interaction in pigeons.

Authors:  D R Thomas; J Lyons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Wavelength generalization and preference in monochromatically reared ducklings.

Authors:  W K Tracy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auditory generalization gradients for response latency in the monkey.

Authors:  D B Moody; W C Stebbins; C Iglauer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential outcome effect in the horse.

Authors:  Y Miyashita; S Nakajima; H Imada
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Shifts in postdiscrimination gradients within a stimulus dimension based on bilateral facial symmetry.

Authors:  Adam Derenne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization of a tactile stimulus in horses.

Authors:  D M Dougherty; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Learning-related shifts in generalization gradients for complex sounds.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Visual Equivalence and Amodal Completion in Cuttlefish.

Authors:  I-Rong Lin; Chuan-Chin Chiao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.