Literature DB >> 16812013

Choice, time allocation, and response rate during stimulus generalization.

C Mandell, J A Nevin.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained to discriminate between two noise intensities using a procedure that assessed choice, time allocation, and response rate simultaneously and independently. Responses on the left or right key (R1 or R2) were respectively correct in the presence of two different intensities, S1 and S2. After a correct response, reinforcement became available for pecks on the center key. Reinforcement density for R1|S1 relative to R2|S2 was varied across experimental conditions. Generalization tests followed extensive training at each condition. As a function of stimulus intensity, proportions of initial choices of R2, of time spent in R2-initiated components, and of center-key responses emitted in R2-initiated components all yielded sigmoidal gradients of similar slope, which shifted slightly in location when relative reinforcement density changed. Changeovers were maximal where initial choice proportions approximated 0.5. Gradients relating the absolute number of center-key responses to stimulus intensity were also roughly sigmoidal, but were more sensitive to changes in reinforcement density. Gradients of momentary response rate also depended on reinforcement density. During training, large but transitory shifts in choice responding occurred when reinforcement density changed, while differences in momentary response rate developed slowly, suggesting separate control of choice and response rate by the contingencies of reinforcement.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812013      PMCID: PMC1333613          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.

Authors:  B MIGLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  A HABER; H I KALISH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

6.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Random interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons.

Authors:  A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.

Authors:  D G Lander; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.