Literature DB >> 4967111

Operant control of response latency in monkeys: evidence for a central explantation.

C A Saslow.   

Abstract

Two monkeys (M. mulatta) were trained to press a telegraph key after onset of a tone and release it quickly in response to a subsequent light or click stimulus occurring after a variable interval. After training first with a fixed time limit on response latency for key release and then with a continuously adjusting limit, reaction time to click was 160 msec and to light, about 200 msec. Temporal contingencies or "payoff bands" were then introduced which reinforced only responses with latencies which fell between two limits 50 msec apart. Feedback was given as to whether each latency was too slow, within the band, or too fast. A trained monkey could precisely center its latency distribution on any 50 msec-wide payoff band located from 200 to 600 msec after the stimulus, with from 60 to 80% of its responses achieving reinforcement. Distribution statistics were comparable to those of trained human subjects. Because such precise timing might be accomplished by a peripheral adjustment, such as changing the manner of holding the key, latency of electromyographic activation was measured in participating arm muscles in one monkey. Electromyographic activation preceded key release by a constant interval, regardless of response latency, indicating a more central mechanism for timing of brief intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 4967111      PMCID: PMC1338456          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS INTENSITY FOR THE MONKEY.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS; J M MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.

Authors:  B MIGLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  OVERT "MEDIATING" BEHAVIOR DURING TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING.

Authors:  V G LATIES; B WEISS; R L CLARK; M D REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A technique for measuring the latency of a discriminative operant.

Authors:  W C Stebbins; R N Lanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A training technique for the daily chairing of monkeys.

Authors:  S Barrow; E Luschei; M Nathan; C Saslow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey.

Authors:  W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Discrimination and emission of temporal intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Premotor and motor components of reaction time.

Authors:  J Botwinick; L W Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-01

10.  Some experiments on simple and choice reaction time.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; R D Luce; E Galanter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Control of key pecking by the duration of a visual stimulus.

Authors:  J J Périkel; M Richelle; J Maurissen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral definition of minimal reaction time in monkeys.

Authors:  C A Saslow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time and its relation to interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J V Keller; F Van Der Schoot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reaction times of younger and older men: effects of compound samples and a prechoice signal on delayed matching-to-sample performances.

Authors:  A Baron; S R Menich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reaction times of younger and older men and temporal contingencies of reinforcement.

Authors:  A Baron; S R Menich; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.