Literature DB >> 4045374

Reaction times of younger and older men: effects of compound samples and a prechoice signal on delayed matching-to-sample performances.

A Baron, S R Menich.   

Abstract

Five younger (18 to 23 yrs) and five older (65 to 73 yrs) men were exposed to a series of immediate and delayed (0 to 15 seconds) matching-to-sample problems. Presentation of the pairs of delayed comparison stimuli was either signaled or unsignaled, and the sample contained either 1, 2, or 3 elements, one of which appeared as the positive stimulus. During initial sessions, unlimited time was available to respond. Subsequently, correct responses were reinforced only if they occurred within a specified time limit. A general finding was slower responding with increased delay and with increased number of sample elements. These effects were reduced when the comparison stimuli were signaled and when time limits were in effect. Errors increased as a function of the manipulations of sample complexity and time limits, but did not change systematically when the delay between sample and comparison stimuli was varied. Although the younger men generally responded more quickly than the older ones, men of both ages showed increased speeds when limits were placed on response time, and these changes were maintained when the temporal contingencies were removed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4045374      PMCID: PMC1348157          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  CHANGE IN REACTION-TIME AS A FUNCTION OF KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS.

Authors:  R M CHURCH; D S CAMP
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1965-03

2.  Response latency as a function of amount of reinforcement.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral definition of minimal reaction time in monkeys.

Authors:  C A Saslow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Aging, brain damage, and psychomotor slowing.

Authors:  L H Hicks; J E Birren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Operant control of response latency in monkeys: evidence for a central explantation.

Authors:  C A Saslow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey.

Authors:  W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Differences in Brown-Peterson recall as function of age and retention interval.

Authors:  V W Inman; S R Parkinson
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1983-01

8.  Reaction times of younger and older men and temporal contingencies of reinforcement.

Authors:  A Baron; S R Menich; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Age-related effects of temporal contingencies on response speed and memory: an operant analysis.

Authors:  A Baron; S R Menich
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1985-01

10.  Generalization gradients and stimulus control in delayed matching-to-sample.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Differential latency and selective nondisclosure in verbal self-reports.

Authors:  T S Critchfield
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1996

2.  Sources cited most frequently in the experimental analysis of human behavior.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; W Buskist; B Saville; J Crockett; T Sherburne; K Keel
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Subject selection.

Authors:  E K Morris; L M Johnson; J T Todd; S T Higgins
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

4.  Bias in self-evaluation: Signal probability effects.

Authors:  T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Verbal self-reports of delayed matching to sample by humans.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli.

Authors:  S D Lane; T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

7.  Global increase in response latencies by early middle age: complexity effects in individual performances.

Authors:  J Myerson; S Hale; R Hirschman; C Hansen; B Christiansen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Visual working memory for semantically related objects in healthy adults.

Authors:  I García-Magariño; J T Fox-Fuller; G Palacios-Navarro; A Baena; Y T Quiroz
Journal:  Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 0.870

9.  Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Signal-detection properties of verbal self-reports.

Authors:  T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.