Literature DB >> 9178019

Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under supergene selection.

G Alvarez1, C Zapata.   

Abstract

Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under the operation of both karyotype and supergene selection in a viability model have been analytically determined. When supergene selection (the effect of recombination in homokaryotypes lowering the mean fitness of their offspring) is acting on gene arrangements and there is no karyotype selection, it is demonstrated that a polymorphic stable equilibrium is reached by the population, which is a function of only the recombination effects in homokaryotypes. Under both supergene and karyotype selection the degree of dominance (h) of karyotype selection is critical to produce a protected inversion polymorphism. In general, the opportunity for protected polymorphism increases as the degree of dominance decreases. For small s values, the conditions for protected polymorphism are r > 2sh and c > 2s(h-1), where r and c are the average loss of viability for offspring of ST/ST and IN/IN homokaryotypes, respectively. These findings suggest that supergene selection may be an important balancing mechanism contributing to the maintenance of inversion polymorphism.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9178019      PMCID: PMC1208010     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  Fitness of karyotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M Wasserman; H R Koepfer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The estimation of fitnesses from population data.

Authors:  T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selective modes associated with karyotypes in Drosophila ananassae. II. Heterosis and frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  K I Kojima; Y N Tobari
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Recombination-induced chromosomal heterosis.

Authors:  M Wasserman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The analysis of simple genetic polymorphisms.

Authors:  P L Workman
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 0.553

6.  Modes of Selection Maintaining an Inversion Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM.

Authors:  M H Gromko; R C Richmond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  An experimental on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Factors influencing fitness in chromosomal strains in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  M Wasserman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Gonzalo Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Molecular variation at the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint site in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry.

Authors:  Mathieu Joron; Lise Frezal; Robert T Jones; Nicola L Chamberlain; Siu F Lee; Christoph R Haag; Annabel Whibley; Michel Becuwe; Simon W Baxter; Laura Ferguson; Paul A Wilkinson; Camilo Salazar; Claire Davidson; Richard Clark; Michael A Quail; Helen Beasley; Rebecca Glithero; Christine Lloyd; Sarah Sims; Matthew C Jones; Jane Rogers; Chris D Jiggins; Richard H ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.