Literature DB >> 439037

The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones.

R A Normann, I Perlman.   

Abstract

1. The photoresponses of light- and dark-adapted red and green cone photoreceptors were recorded intracellularly in the retina of the turtle, Pseduemys scripta elegans. Background illumination produced similar effects on both types of cones. 2. In response to the onset of a prolonged, steady background illumination the cone initially hyperpolarized to a peak which then sagged back to a steady-state polarization that was typically about one half the initial peak amplitude. This sag was observed for all backgrounds studied (dim as well as bright). 3. A resensitization was observed concomitantly with this sag; both the maximum increment and decrement responses grew in amplitude as light-adaptation proceeded. After about 2--3 min of background illumination, the amplitudes of these responses stabilized. 4. The dark-adapted cone produced graded responses to test pulses over a range of intensities spanning about 3.5 log units. The amplitudes of these responses were well fit by the relationship V = I.Vm/(I + sigma). 5. After 2--3 min of background illumination, 500 msec test pulses either brighter or dimmer than the background intensity were substituted for the background. The light-adapted intensity-response curves constructed from this data were similar to the dark-adapted curve but were shifted horizontally and slightly vertically, so that they still spanned about 3.5 log units of intensity. Thus, in the light-adapted cone, graded responses were elicited by a range of bright test pulses which would have produced saturated responses when delivered to the dark-adapted cone. 6. The 'off response' observed at the offset of the background became faster as the background intensity was increased. It also became faster with time following the onset of any particular background intensity. 7. It was concluded that cone sensitivity during any state of light-adaptation is determined by two mechanisms; response compression resulting from the instantaneous non-linearity between 'internal transmitter' concentration and membrane potential and a more active 'cellular adaptation' mechanism which is manifest as a shift in the intensity-response curve. In the steady-state condition of light-adaptation, most of the sensitivity changes are a result of the cellular adaptation mechanism. 8. Photopigment bleaching caused by the backgrounds, negative feed-back from horizontal cells and voltage dependent mechanisms in the cones could not account for this cellular adaptation. These effects of background illumination were interpreted in terms of the 'internal transmitter' hypothesis of phototransduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 439037      PMCID: PMC1281585          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  16 in total

1.  CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS.

Authors:  M G FUORTES; A L HODGKIN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Signal transmission from red cones to horizontal cells in the turtle retina.

Authors:  R A Normann; I Perlman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Internal recording of the early receptor potential in turtle cones.

Authors:  A L Hodgkin; P M Obryan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  D A Baylor; M G Fuortes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  D A Baylor; M G Fuortes; P M O'Bryan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Sensitivity of toad rods: Dependence on wave-length and background illumination.

Authors:  G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Effects of adapting lights on the time course of the receptor potential of the anuran retinal rod.

Authors:  J A Coles; S Yamane
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Rhodopsin kinetics in the human eye.

Authors:  M Alpern
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  54 in total

1.  Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors.

Authors:  T A Duke; D Bray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The unseen color aftereffect of an unseen stimulus: insight from blindsight into mechanisms of color afterimages.

Authors:  J L Barbur; L Weiskrantz; J A Harlow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Engineering aspects of enzymatic signal transduction: photoreceptors in the retina.

Authors:  P B Detwiler; S Ramanathan; A Sengupta; B I Shraiman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Signal transmission from red cones to horizontal cells in the turtle retina.

Authors:  R A Normann; I Perlman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?

Authors:  T Mertelmeier
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Light adaptation in cone photoreceptors of the salamander: a role for cytoplasmic calcium.

Authors:  H R Matthews; G L Fain; R L Murphy; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Light adaptation and the luminance-response function of the cone electroretinogram.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; D J Derlacki; G A Fishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  ON- and OFF-response of the photopic electroretinogram in relation to stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Marko Hawlina; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The temporal structure of transient ON/OFF ganglion cell responses and its relation to intra-retinal processing.

Authors:  Andreas Thiel; Martin Greschner; Josef Ammermüller
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 1.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.