Literature DB >> 805837

Effects of adapting lights on the time course of the receptor potential of the anuran retinal rod.

J A Coles, S Yamane.   

Abstract

1. The intracellular receptor potential of the retinal rod cell was recorded in the unperfused, isolated retina of Rana catesbiana and in the perfused, isolated retina of Bufo marinus. Qualitatively, the responses from the two preparations were similar. 2. The rate at which the receptor potential returned to the dark level at the termination of a pulse of light (Voff) was measured at a fixed potential chosen to be about 0-6 of the way from the dark level to the peak of the response. 3. When the light intensity was such that less than about 10-minus 5 of the photopigment was bleached per second, Voff increased as the duration of the pulse was increased, reaching a maximum in 50-100 s. 4. When a brief test flash was presented at various intervals after an adapting pulse lasting about 50 s, Voff for the test flash was greater than the value in the dark adapted state for times up to about 80 s after the adapting pulse. 5. It has been hypothesized that in the vertebrate rod light causes release from the disk sacs of particles which block conducting channels in the surface membrane (Yoshikami & Hagins, 1971, 1973). A modification is proposed in which the blocking particles are converted to an inactive state can be increased by light adaptation. 6. This modified hypothesis will account qualitatively for the further observations that (a) during the response to illumination lasting several seconds the membrane potential recovers part of the way to the dark level and (b) if a second light pulse is superimposed on this background illumination then after the superimposed pulse the depolarization is increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 805837      PMCID: PMC1309461          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  16 in total

1.  An analysis of light-induced admittance changes in rod outer segments.

Authors:  G Falk; P Fatt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Identification of intracellular responses in the frog retina.

Authors:  N Matsumoto; K I Naka
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-07-13       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The rod response in the frog and studies by intracellular recording.

Authors:  J Toyoda; H Hashimoto; H Anno; T Tomita
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Dark ionic flux and the effects of light in isolated rod outer segments.

Authors:  J I Korenbrot; R A Cone
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Spectral response curves of single cones in the carp.

Authors:  T Tomita; A Kaneko; M Murakami; E L Pautler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus.

Authors:  J E Brown; L H Pinto
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effects of chemicals on receptors and horizontal cells in the retina.

Authors:  M Murakami; K Otsu; T Otsuka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.

Authors:  Peter D Calvert; Victor I Govardovskii; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Clint L Makino
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  A possible model for the electrical responses of frog rods during light and dark adaptation.

Authors:  S Yamane
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976-08-30       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Functional characteristics of lateral interactions between rods in the retina of the snapping turtle.

Authors:  D R Copenhagen; W G Owen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones.

Authors:  R A Normann; I Perlman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  cGMP binding sites on photoreceptor phosphodiesterase: role in feedback regulation of visual transduction.

Authors:  R H Cote; M D Bownds; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The effects of low calcium and background light on the sensitivity of toad rods.

Authors:  B L Bastian; G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Responses of rod bipolar cells in the dark-adapted retina of the dogfish, Scyliorhinus canicula.

Authors:  J F Ashmore; G Falk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Onset of feedback reactions underlying vertebrate rod photoreceptor light adaptation.

Authors:  P D Calvert; T W Ho; Y M LeFebvre; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Novel form of adaptation in mouse retinal rods speeds recovery of phototransduction.

Authors:  Claudia M Krispel; Ching-Kang Chen; Melvin I Simon; Marie E Burns
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Light adaptation in retinal rods of the rabbit and two other nonprimate mammals.

Authors:  K Nakatani; T Tamura; K W Yau
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.086

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.