Literature DB >> 16906409

ON- and OFF-response of the photopic electroretinogram in relation to stimulus characteristics.

Maja Sustar1, Marko Hawlina, Jelka Brecelj.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of stimulus duration, stimulus intensity, stimulus wavelength and background luminance on the amplitude and waveform of the ON- (b-wave) and OFF- (d-wave) response of the photopic ERG. The following parameters were used in this study: stimulus duration from 5 to 200 ms, the flash intensities from 0.4 to 2.1 log cd s/m2, the background luminance from 20 to 50 cd/m2 and stimulus wavelengths 460, 508 and 667 nm. Prolonging the stimulus duration from 75 to 200 ms did not influence the amplitudes of a-, b- and d-waves significantly. Higher stimulus intensities (1.9 log cd s/m2) broadened the b-wave and increased variability of its implicit time. With a brighter background (50 cd/m2) the b-wave did not broaden and its optimal amplitude was preserved. Stimuli of longer wavelengths (667 nm) significantly reduced the d-wave amplitude. Our results suggest that high intensities and longer wavelengths (red) may not be suitable stimulus parameters in the routine clinical ON- and OFF-response recording.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906409     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-006-9013-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  26 in total

1.  Genotype-phenotype correlation in British families with X linked congenital stationary night blindness.

Authors:  L E Allen; I Zito; K Bradshaw; R J Patel; A C Bird; F Fitzke; J R Yates; D Trump; A J Hardcastle; A T Moore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Graham E Holder; Mathias W Seeliger; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Response linearity and kinetics of the cat retina: the bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  J G Robson; L J Frishman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones.

Authors:  R A Normann; I Perlman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  ERG off-effects produced by short duration stimuli.

Authors:  J W Walters; E L Smith; R E Manny
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1981-10

7.  Autosomal dominant cone and cone-rod dystrophy with mutations in the guanylate cyclase activator 1A gene-encoding guanylate cyclase activating protein-1.

Authors:  S M Downes; G E Holder; F W Fitzke; A M Payne; M J Warren; S S Bhattacharya; A C Bird
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01

8.  Severe course of cutaneous melanoma associated paraneoplastic retinopathy.

Authors:  U Kellner; N Bornfeld; M H Foerster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The contribution of on-bipolar cells to the electroretinogram of rabbits and monkeys. A study using 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (APB).

Authors:  A G Knapp; P H Schiller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Three cone mechanisms in the primate electroretinogram: two with, one without off-center bipolar responses.

Authors:  H U Evers; P Gouras
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  9 in total

1.  On- and off-response ERGs elicited by sawtooth stimuli in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Gobinda Pangeni; Robert Lämmer; Ralf P Tornow; Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Barbara Cvenkel; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Spatial distributions of on- and off-responses determined with the multifocal ERG.

Authors:  Anderson R Rodrigues; Manoel da Silva Filho; Luiz Carlos L Silveira; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Kristina Gottschalk; Christian Y Mardin; Gobinda Pangeni; Anselm G Jünemann; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Use of extended protocols with nonstandard stimuli to characterize rod and cone contributions to the canine electroretinogram.

Authors:  Nate Pasmanter; Laurence M Occelli; András M Komáromy; Simon M Petersen-Jones
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Photopic ON- and OFF-responses in complete type of congenital stationary night blindness in relation to stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Branka Stirn-Kranjc; Marko Hawlina; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-18       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Full-field electroretinogram response to increment and decrement stimuli.

Authors:  Eric Vukmanic; Kate Godwin; Pan Shi; Alan Hughes; Paul DeMarco
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Quantifying the ON and OFF Contributions to the Flash ERG with the Discrete Wavelet Transform.

Authors:  Mathieu Gauvin; Maja Sustar; John M Little; Jelka Brecelj; Jean-Marc Lina; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic On-Off ERG.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Graham E Holder; Jan Kremers; Claire S Barnes; Bo Lei; Naheed W Khan; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.