Literature DB >> 408845

Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training.

D A Overton.   

Abstract

Rats learned drug vs. drug (D vs. D) or drug vs. no drug (D vs. N) discriminations in a T-maze shock escape task with various doses of pentobarbital, phenobarbital, or ethanol. Dose-effect curves were obtained for each drug using D vs. N training. After D vs. N training with any one of these drugs, rats made D choices during substitution tests with the other two drugs, suggesting drug interchangeability. D vs. D training also showed that pentobarbital and phenobarbital were virtually indistinguishable from one another. However, ethanol was readily discriminated from pentobarbital, showing that the two drugs differed. The results show the utility of D vs. D training as a method for studying drug differences that may be too small to detect with substitution tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 408845     DOI: 10.1007/bf00426492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of the discriminable CNS effects of ketamine, phencyclidine and pentobarbital.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1975-06

Review 2.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

3.  Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats.

Authors:  H Barry
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

4.  Mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  I D Hirschhorn; J C Winter
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1971

5.  State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

6.  Delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, ethanol, and amphetamine as discriminative stimuli-generalization tests with other drugs.

Authors:  O F Bueno; E A Carlini; E Finkelfarb; J S Suzuki
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1976-04-15
  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: a methodological report.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Early preclinical studies of discriminable sedative and hallucinogenic drug effects.

Authors:  Herbert Barry; James B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discrimination of Ro 11-6896, chlordiazepoxide and ethanol in gerbils: generalization and antagonism tests.

Authors:  A J Hiltunen; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat.

Authors:  J De Vry; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Test for a neurochemically specific mechanism mediating drug discriminations and for stimulus masking.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations.

Authors:  J M Witkin; R B Carter; L A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, barbital, and phenobarbital in rats.

Authors:  J L York
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.