Literature DB >> 104341

A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, barbital, and phenobarbital in rats.

J L York.   

Abstract

Five different groups of rats were trained in a food-motivated, bar-pressing task to discriminate from the nondrug condition (physiologic saline, i.p.) the effects produced by i.p. injections of ethanol (330, 660, or 990 mg/kg), sodium barbital (80 mg/kg), or sodium phenobarbital (25 mg/kg). The establishment of highly effective discriminations required 20--40 training sessions for all drugs, with the exception that rats trained with 330 mg/kg of ethanol required 80--100 training sessions. After the drug-nondrug discriminations were well established, cross tests revealed that ethanol did not elicit drug-appropriate responding in the groups trained with sodium barbital or sodium phenobarbital. However, both barbiturates elicited drug-approppriate responding to some extent in rats trained with ethanol as the discriminative stimulus. With barbital, the greatest generalization was observed in rats trained with the low dose of ethanol (330 mg/kg). The findings emphasize the need for the use of several training doses and for transfer tests in both directions when the stimulus effects of drugs are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 104341     DOI: 10.1007/bf00429173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  8 in total

1.  THE ADDICTION RESEARCH CENTER INVENTORY: STANDARDIZATION OF SCALES WHICH EVALUATE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF MORPHINE, AMPHETAMINE, PENTOBARBITAL, ALCOHOL, LSD-25, PYRAHEXYL AND CHLORPROMAZINE.

Authors:  H E HILL; C A HAERTZEN; A B WOLBACH; E J MINER
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1963-05-15

2.  Partial equivalence of chronic alcohol and barbiturate intoxications.

Authors:  H F FRASER; A WIKLER; H ISBELL; N K JOHNSON
Journal:  Q J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1957-12

3.  Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats.

Authors:  H Barry
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

4.  Development and loss of tolerance to ethanol in goldfish.

Authors:  H B Greizerstein; C M Smith
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Barbiturate abuse and addiction and their relationship to alcohol and alcoholism.

Authors:  P Devenyi; M Wilson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1971-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Abuse of barbiturates in an alcoholic population.

Authors:  P Devenyi; M Wilson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1971-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

8.  Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 4.530

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Free-choice responding for ethanol versus water in alcohol preferring (P) and unselected Wistar rats is differentially modified by naloxone, bromocriptine, and methysergide.

Authors:  F Weiss; M Mitchiner; F E Bloom; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of dopaminergic agents on alcohol consumption by rats in a limited access paradigm.

Authors:  M A Linseman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat.

Authors:  J De Vry; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Alcohol consumption in free-feeding rats: procedural, genetic and pharmacokinetic factors.

Authors:  M A Linseman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 6.  Drug discrimination by humans compared to nonhumans: current status and future directions.

Authors:  J B Kamien; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins; B J Smith
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; G D D'Mello
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Studies on the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  J L York; R Bush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Ovarian hormones and the heterogeneous receptor mechanisms mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in female rats.

Authors:  Christa M Helms; Aubrey D McCracken; Sharon L Heichman; Travis M Moschak
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Discriminative stimulus effects of inhaled 1,1,1-trichloroethane in mice: comparison to other hydrocarbon vapors and volatile anesthetics.

Authors:  Keith L Shelton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.