Literature DB >> 6812113

Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm.

D A Overton.   

Abstract

This paper reports preclinical data that may predict the amount of state-dependent learning likely to be produced in humans by various psychoactive drugs. In a T-maze, rats were required to turn right when drugged and left when not drugged to escape from electric shock. The number of training sessions required to learn this drug versus no drug discrimination was used as an indicator of the degree of discriminability of the training drug. Using this procedure, the discriminability of more than 100 common psychoactive drugs was determined at one or more doses. Sessions to criterion usually decreased as dosage was increased. Maximum discriminability occurred at the highest usable dose in most cases, and differed considerably for drugs of various types. The results suggest that the majority of psychoactive drugs can be investigated by use of the drug discrimination technique, and that state-dependent learning effects will not accompany clinical use of most psychoactive drugs unless intoxicating doses are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6812113     DOI: 10.1007/bf00449130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  19 in total

1.  Discriminable effects of benzodiazepines.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Commun       Date:  1976

2.  A comparison of the discriminable CNS effects of ketamine, phencyclidine and pentobarbital.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1975-06

3.  Methaqualone discrimination in gerbils: interactions with bemegride and imidazoline (DH-524).

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Biol       Date:  1976-12

Review 4.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

5.  Asymmetrical dissociation of learning between scopolamine and Wy 4036, a new benzodiazepine tranquilizer.

Authors:  B D Berger; L Stein
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

6.  State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

7.  Physostigmine as a discriminative cue in rats.

Authors:  J O Johansson; T U Järbe
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1976-01

8.  Drug discrimination in rats: effects of mixtures of ditran and cholinesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  T U Järbe; J O Johansson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Investigation of narcotics and antitussives using drug discrimination techniques.

Authors:  D A Overton; S K Batta
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Characteristics of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-produced discrimination in rats.

Authors:  T U Järbe; J O Johansson; B G Henriksson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  28 in total

1.  Ethanol→Nicotine & Nicotine→Ethanol drug-sequence discriminations: Conditional stimulus control with two interoceptive drug elements in rats.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.405

2.  The relative salience of morphine and contextual cues as conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  N M Bormann; D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Discrimination of Ro 11-6896, chlordiazepoxide and ethanol in gerbils: generalization and antagonism tests.

Authors:  A J Hiltunen; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Test for a neurochemically specific mechanism mediating drug discriminations and for stimulus masking.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The effect of drugs on the acquisition of stimulus control in a conditioned suppression procedure.

Authors:  E B Nielsen; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1982-1983.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Discriminative stimulus properties of tripelennamine in the pigeon.

Authors:  C A Karas; M Picker; A Poling
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Centrally acting drugs act as conditioned stimuli in a conditioned suppression of drinking task.

Authors:  D A Overton; C F Shen; T A Tatham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Route of administration influences substitution patterns in rats trained to discriminate methadone vs. vehicle.

Authors:  Robert E Vann; Laura E Wise; Stephen A Varvel; Scott D Philibin; D Matthew Walentiny; Joseph H Porter
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Measurement of the lowest dosage of phenobarbital that can produce drug discrimination in rats.

Authors:  Donald A Overton; Gregg D Stanwood; Bhavesh N Patel; Sreenivasa R Pragada; M Kathleen Gordon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.