Literature DB >> 4067497

The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization.

W K Bickel, B C Etzel.   

Abstract

This paper is a selective review of research that addresses the validity of two interpretations of stimulus generalization. One interpretation, referred to as the descriptive stimulus-control interpretation, proposes that during stimulus generalization a continuous relation exists between stimulus and response dimensions. The other interpretation, referred to as the quantal interpretation, proposes that a stimulus-response relation functions as a unit that may or may not occur. From the latter viewpoint, the continuity typically obtained during generalization tests is deemed to be artifactual and to result from averaging across multiple controlling stimulus-response relations. Studies examining the contribution of these multiple relations to generalization gradients are reviewed. With few exceptions, the quantal interpretation appears to better characterize the results of these studies. Implications for peak shift, selection of analytical level, and identification of the behavioral unit are discussed, as well as factors that may determine the acceptability of the quantal interpretation.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4067497      PMCID: PMC1348181          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  40 in total

1.  Primary stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W F PROKASY; J F HALL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Method for sensory scaling with animals.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; P VAN SOMMERS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Control of a continuous response dimension by a continuous stimulus dimension.

Authors:  D G Wildemann; J G Holland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The microanalysis of fixed-interval responding.

Authors:  G D Gentry; B Weiss; V G Laties
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  B Migler; J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Tilted lines as complex stimuli.

Authors:  P E Touchette
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of ethanol on multiple fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedule performances: dynamic interactions at different fixed-ratio values.

Authors:  J E Barrett; J A Stanley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The allocation of time to temporally defined behaviors: responding during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  M A Crowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick; Mi Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus control shaping and stimulus control topographies.

Authors:  W J McIlvane; W V Dube
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1992

3.  Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions.

Authors:  William J McIlvane; William V Dube
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

4.  Toward an explicit analysis of generalization: A stimulus control interpretation.

Authors:  K C Kirby; W K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

5.  Joint control and the selection of stimuli from their description.

Authors:  Barry Lowenkron
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2006

6.  Comments on Skinner's grammar.

Authors:  J H Mabry
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1993

7.  Within-subject reversibility of discriminative function in the composite-stimulus control of behavior.

Authors:  Stanley J Weiss; David N Kearns; Maria Antoshina
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Inhibition: A cautionary tale.

Authors:  J W Donahoe; D C Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavior dynamics: One perspective.

Authors:  M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some Things We Learned from Sidman and Some We Did Not (We Think).

Authors:  William J McIlvane; Joanne B Kledaras
Journal:  Eur J Behav Anal       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.