Literature DB >> 5781147

Tilted lines as complex stimuli.

P E Touchette.   

Abstract

Severely retarded boys were taught to respond differentially to lines tilted at 45 degrees and 135 degrees . While all subjects could perform the discrimination, the aspect of the stimulus that controlled responding was shown to differ among subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1969        PMID： 5781147      PMCID： PMC1338548          DOI： 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN： 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  DISCRIMINATION OF DIRECTION OF LINE IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  R G RUDEL; H L TEUBER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-10

2.  Cat's ability to discriminate oblique rectangles.

Authors:  N S SUTHERLAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

5.  Visual discrimination of orientation by octopus.

Authors:  N S SUTHERLAND
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1957-02

6.  The course of acquisition of a line-tilt discrimination by rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  B A Ray
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children.

Authors:  M Sidman; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Two types of behavioral contrast in discrimination learning.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavioral contrast and relative reinforcement frequency in two multiple schedules.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment.

Authors:  W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468
View more
  9 in total

1.  Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions.

Authors:  William J McIlvane; William V Dube
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Toward an explicit analysis of generalization: A stimulus control interpretation.

Authors:  K C Kirby; W K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

3.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sample stimulus control shaping and restricted stimulus control in capuchin monkeys: a methodological note.

Authors:  Ana Leda F Brino; Romariz S Barros; Olavo F Galvão; M Garotti; Ilara R N da Cruz; José R Santos; William V Dube; William J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.

Authors:  W V Dube; W J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Transfer of stimulus control: measuring the moment of transfer.

Authors:  P E Touchette
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Bickel; B C Etzel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Visual attention in retarded adults: combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior.

Authors:  N H Huguenin; P E Touchette
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The acquisition of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; K L Mueller; L T Martin; C A Bowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.