Literature DB >> 20514167

Within-subject reversibility of discriminative function in the composite-stimulus control of behavior.

Stanley J Weiss1, David N Kearns, Maria Antoshina.   

Abstract

According to the composite-stimulus control model (Weiss, 1969, 1972b), an individual discriminative stimulus (S(D)) is composed of that S(D)'s on-state plus the off-states of all other relevant S(D)s. The present experiment investigated the reversibility of composite-stimulus control. Separate groups of rats were trained to lever-press for food whenever a tone or a light S(D) was present. For one group, the nonreinforced S(Delta) condition was tone-and-light absence (T+L). Tone-plus-light (T+L) was S(Delta) in the other group. On a "stimulus compounding" test that recombined composite elements, maximum responding occurred to that composite consisting only of elements occasioning response increase. That was T+L for the group trained with T+L as S(Delta) and T+L for the group trained with T+L as S(Delta). The S(Delta) composite was next reversed over groups in Phase 2. In Phase 2 tests, maximum responding that was comparable in magnitude to that of Phase 1 was again controlled by the composite consisting only of elements most recently occasioning response increase-whether T+L or T+L. The inhibitory conditioning history of both composite-elements currently occasioning responding did not weaken the summative effect. These results confirm and extend Weiss's composite-stimulus control model, and demonstrate that such control is fully reversible. We discuss how translating conditions of the stimulus-compounding paradigm to a composite continuum creates a functional and logical connection to intradimensional control measured through stimulus generalization, reducing the number of different behavioral phenomena requiring unique explanations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  additive summation; composite-stimulus control; composite-stimulus recombination test; rats; reversal learning; stimulus compounding; stimulus generalization peak shift

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20514167      PMCID: PMC2771671          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

2.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Compounding discriminative stimuli controlling free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  H H Emurian; S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive processes and the peak shift.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R J Dacanay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination training and stimulus compounding: consideration of non-reinforcement and response differentiation consequences of S.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning. A review and analysis.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Attention in the pigeon: differential effects of food-getting versus shock-avoidance procedures.

Authors:  D D Foree; V M LoLordo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-12

8.  An effective and economical sound-attenuation chamber.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Bickel; B C Etzel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Selective associations produced solely with appetitive contingencies: the stimulus-reinforcer interaction revisited.

Authors:  S J Weiss; L V Panlilio; C W Schindler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intermittent access training produces greater motivation for a non-drug reinforcer than long access training.

Authors:  Madeline M Beasley; Tommy Gunawan; Brendan J Tunstall; David N Kearns
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.