Literature DB >> 4045582

Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli.

W S Geisler, K D Davila.   

Abstract

An earlier paper [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 775 (1984)] described a general ideal discriminator (a Stimuli-Defined-Exactly observer) whose sensitivity is limited only by the initial sequence of mechanisms in the visual system--the optics of the eye, the receptor lattice, receptor optics, and photopigment spectral sensitivities. In the present paper, further properties of the model are derived, and a similar model (a Stimuli-Defined-Statistically observer) is developed for conditions with stimulus uncertainty. To test the predictions of the models, two-point intensity discrimination, resolution, and separation discrimination were measured as a function of point-source energy and background luminance. Three important differences between resolution and separation discrimination were found: (1) At moderate to high intensity levels, separation threshold is much smaller than resolution threshold. (2) At low intensity levels, resolution threshold is smaller than separation threshold. (3) Separation threshold decreases more rapidly than resolution threshold as a function of intensity. All three properties were predicted by the models. However, as expected, the quantitative fits are not accurate. The value of the models is that they allow one to determine, for almost arbitrary visual-discrimination tasks, what aspects of performance are accounted for by preneural factors. Furthermore, the models provide a precise metric of the discrimination information available at the receptors. This permits meaningful comparison of human performance across different tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4045582     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.2.001483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  10 in total

1.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Decreased visual performance resulting from temporal uncertainty, target movement, and background movement.

Authors:  K W Gish; J B Sheehy; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-08

3.  The harmonic bandwidth of phase-reversal discrimination.

Authors:  P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

4.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A simple model of human foveal ganglion cell responses to hyperacuity stimuli.

Authors:  T Wachtler; C Wehrhahn; B B Lee
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Stochastic model for detection of signals in noise.

Authors:  Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Image-size differences worsen stereopsis independent of eye position.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Accuracy Maximization Analysis for Sensory-Perceptual Tasks: Computational Improvements, Filter Robustness, and Coding Advantages for Scaled Additive Noise.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Priyank Jaini
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A neural computation for visual acuity in the presence of eye movements.

Authors:  Xaq Pitkow; Haim Sompolinsky; Markus Meister
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.