Literature DB >> 19884912

Stochastic model for detection of signals in noise.

Stanley A Klein1, Dennis M Levi.   

Abstract

Fifty years ago Birdsall, Tanner, and colleagues made rapid progress in developing signal detection theory into a powerful psychophysical tool. One of their major insights was the utility of adding external noise to the signals of interest. These methods have been enhanced in recent years by the addition of multipass and classification-image methods for opening up the black box. There remain a number of as yet unresolved issues. In particular, Birdsall developed a theorem that large amounts of external input noise can linearize nonlinear systems, and Tanner conjectured, with mathematical backup, that what had been previously thought of as a nonlinear system could actually be a linear system with uncertainty. Recent findings, both experimental and theoretical, have validated Birdsall's theorem and Tanner's conjecture. However, there have also been experimental and theoretical findings with the opposite outcome. In this paper we present new data and simulations in an attempt to sort out these issues. Our simulations and experiments plus data from others show that Birdsall's theorem is quite robust. We argue that uncertainty can serve as an explanation for violations of Birdsall's linearization by noise and also for reports of stochastic resonance. In addition, we modify present models to better handle detection of signals with both noise and pedestal backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19884912      PMCID: PMC2942087          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.00B110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  36 in total

1.  Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Effects of contrast and length on vernier acuity explained with noisy templates.

Authors:  William McIlhagga; Ari Pääkkönen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.

Authors:  J Nachmias; R V Sansbury
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms.

Authors:  C F Stromeyer; S Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

6.  Spatial summation in visual noise.

Authors:  D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Detection and identification: how are they related?

Authors:  J P Thomas
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli.

Authors:  W S Geisler; K D Davila
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection.

Authors:  D J Lasley; T E Cohn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation.

Authors:  A Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  12 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  The absolute threshold of cone vision.

Authors:  Darren Koenig; Heidi Hofer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Involuntary attention enhances identification accuracy for unmasked low contrast letters using non-predictive peripheral cues.

Authors:  Weston Pack; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  How inherently noisy is human sensory processing?

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

7.  Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, non-linearity.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Daniel H Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Broadband noise masks suppress neural responses to narrowband stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Greta Vilidaitė
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-15

10.  Developmental mechanisms underlying improved contrast thresholds for discriminations of orientation signals embedded in noise.

Authors:  Seong Taek Jeon; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.