Literature DB >> 4038398

The total length of spindle microtubules depends on the number of chromosomes present.

R B Nicklas, G W Gordon.   

Abstract

We extracted chromosomes by micromanipulation from Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes, producing metaphase spindles with only one or a few chromosomes instead of the usual complement of 23. Cells with various numbers of chromosomes were prepared for electron microscopy, and spindle microtubule length was measured. A constant increment of microtubule length was lost upon the removal of each chromosome; we estimate that only approximately 40% of the original length would remain in the total absence of chromosomes. Unexpectedly, kinetochore microtubules were not the only ones affected when chromosomes were removed: nonkinetochore microtubules accounted for a substantial fraction of the total length lost. No compensatory increase in microtubule length outside the spindle was found. Studies by others show that the kinetochore microtubules of extracted chromosomes are left behind in the cell and dissassemble. The resulting increase in subunit concentration would be expected from in vitro studies to drive microtubule assembly until the original total microtubule length was restored, but that did not happen in these living cells. We conclude that the assembly of a certain, large fraction of microtubule subunits into stable microtubules is dependent on the presence of chromosomes. Possible explanations include (a) limits on microtubule length that prevent any net assembly of the subunits released after chromosomes are removed or (b) a promotion of microtubule assembly by chromosomes, which therefore is reduced in their absence. Chromosome-dependent regulation of microtubule length may account for some features of normal mitosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4038398      PMCID: PMC2113474          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.100.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  12 in total

Review 1.  Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement.

Authors:  E D Salmon
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1975-06-30       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. I. Formation and breakdown of the mitotic apparatus.

Authors:  U P Roos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Staehly
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  A model for the microtubule organizing activity of the centrosomes and kinetochores in mammalian cells.

Authors:  M De Brabander
Journal:  Cell Biol Int Rep       Date:  1982-10

5.  Origin of kinetochore microtubules in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  P L Witt; H Ris; G G Borisy
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; B R Brinkley; D A Pepper; D F Kubai; G K Rickards
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Microtubular origin of mitotic spindle form birefringence. Demonstration of the applicability of Wiener's equation.

Authors:  H Sato; G W Ellis; S Inoué
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  A quantitative analysis of microtubule elongation.

Authors:  J Bryan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Tubulin assembly sites and the organization of cytoplasmic microtubules in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  B R Brinkley; S M Cox; D A Pepper; L Wible; S L Brenner; R L Pardue
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement.

Authors:  S Inoué; H Sato
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 2.  Mitotic spindle assembly in animal cells: a fine balancing act.

Authors:  Suzanna L Prosser; Laurence Pelletier
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Segregation of holocentric chromosomes at meiosis in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  D G Albertson; J N Thomson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Sperm chromatin acquires an activity that induces microtubule assembly during residence in the cytoplasm of metaphase oocytes of the mouse.

Authors:  W Harrouk; H J Clarke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Regulation of chromosome speeds in mitosis.

Authors:  M D Betterton; J Richard McIntosh
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.321

7.  Evidence for an upper limit to mitotic spindle length.

Authors:  Martin Wühr; Yao Chen; Sophie Dumont; Aaron C Groen; Daniel J Needleman; Adrian Salic; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The polarity and stability of microtubule capture by the kinetochore.

Authors:  P Huitorel; M W Kirschner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules.

Authors:  T S Hays; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm.

Authors:  K Church; R B Nicklas; H P Lin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.