Literature DB >> 18718761

Evidence for an upper limit to mitotic spindle length.

Martin Wühr1, Yao Chen, Sophie Dumont, Aaron C Groen, Daniel J Needleman, Adrian Salic, Timothy J Mitchison.   

Abstract

Size specification of macromolecular assemblies in the cytoplasm is poorly understood [1]. In principle, assemblies could scale with cell size or use intrinsic mechanisms. For the mitotic spindle, scaling with cell size is expected, because the function of this assembly is to physically move sister chromatids into the center of nascent daughter cells. Eggs of Xenopus laevis are among the largest cells known that cleave completely during cell division. Cell length in this organism changes by two orders of magnitude ( approximately 1200 microm to approximately 12 microm) while it develops from a fertilized egg into a tadpole [2]. We wondered whether, and how, mitotic spindle length and morphology adapt to function at these different length scales. Here, we show that spindle length increases with cell length in small cells, but in very large cells spindle length approaches an upper limit of approximately 60 microm. Further evidence for an upper limit to spindle length comes from an embryonic extract system that recapitulates mitotic spindle assembly in a test tube. We conclude that early mitotic spindle length in Xenopus laevis is uncoupled from cell length, reaching an upper bound determined by mechanisms that are intrinsic to the spindle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718761      PMCID: PMC2561182          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  27 in total

1.  Xenopus laevis embryo development: arrest of epidermal cell differentiation by the chelating agent 1,10-phenanthroline.

Authors:  M Montorzi; M H Burgos; K H Falchuk
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 2.  Visualization of the cytoskeleton in Xenopus oocytes and eggs by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Bret E Becker; David L Gard
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2006

3.  Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation.

Authors:  Manuel Théry; Andrea Jiménez-Dalmaroni; Victor Racine; Michel Bornens; Frank Jülicher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Slide-and-cluster models for spindle assembly.

Authors:  Kendra S Burbank; Timothy J Mitchison; Daniel S Fisher
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  A gynogenetic screen to isolate naturally occurring recessive mutations in Xenopus tropicalis.

Authors:  Selina Noramly; Lyle Zimmerman; Amanda Cox; Renee Aloise; Marilyn Fisher; Robert M Grainger
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  Roles of polymerization dynamics, opposed motors, and a tensile element in governing the length of Xenopus extract meiotic spindles.

Authors:  T J Mitchison; P Maddox; J Gaetz; A Groen; M Shirasu; A Desai; E D Salmon; T M Kapoor
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Asymmetric division in mouse oocytes: with or without Mos.

Authors:  M H Verlhac; C Lefebvre; P Guillaud; P Rassinier; B Maro
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression.

Authors:  Monika I Mayr; Stefan Hümmer; Jenny Bormann; Tamara Grüner; Sarah Adio; Guenther Woehlke; Thomas U Mayer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A default mechanism of spindle orientation based on cell shape is sufficient to generate cell fate diversity in polarised Xenopus blastomeres.

Authors:  Bernhard Strauss; Richard J Adams; Nancy Papalopulu
Journal:  Development       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Xenopus tropicalis egg extracts provide insight into scaling of the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Katherine S Brown; Michael D Blower; Thomas J Maresca; Timothy C Grammer; Richard M Harland; Rebecca Heald
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  101 in total

1.  Mitotic chromosome size scaling in Xenopus.

Authors:  Esther K Kieserman; Rebecca Heald
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Size Scaling of Microtubule Assemblies in Early Xenopus Embryos.

Authors:  Timothy J Mitchison; Keisuke Ishihara; Phuong Nguyen; Martin Wühr
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Intracellular Scaling Mechanisms.

Authors:  Simone Reber; Nathan W Goehring
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Spatial organization of the Ran pathway by microtubules in mitosis.

Authors:  Doogie Oh; Che-Hang Yu; Daniel J Needleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The evolution of spindles and their mechanical implications for cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Sungmin Nam; Ovijit Chaudhuri; Hsiao-Chun Huang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Understanding eukaryotic chromosome segregation from a comparative biology perspective.

Authors:  Snezhana Oliferenko
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Spindle fusion requires dynein-mediated sliding of oppositely oriented microtubules.

Authors:  Jesse C Gatlin; Alexandre Matov; Aaron C Groen; Daniel J Needleman; Thomas J Maresca; Gaudenz Danuser; Timothy J Mitchison; E D Salmon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  The biology of boundary conditions: cellular reconstitution in one, two, and three dimensions.

Authors:  Michael D Vahey; Daniel A Fletcher
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 9.  Use of Xenopus cell-free extracts to study size regulation of subcellular structures.

Authors:  Predrag Jevtić; Ana Milunović-Jevtić; Matthew R Dilsaver; Jesse C Gatlin; Daniel L Levy
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.203

Review 10.  Force and length in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.