Literature DB >> 3098743

Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm.

K Church, R B Nicklas, H P Lin.   

Abstract

Single (individual) bivalents in cultured Drosophila melanogaster primary spermatocytes were detached from the spindle with a micromanipulation needle and placed in the cytoplasm. Such bivalents are prevented from rejoining the spindle by a natural membrane barrier that surrounds the spindle, but they quickly orient as if on a spindle of their own and the half-bivalents separate in anaphase. Serial section electron microscopy shows that a mini-spindle forms around the cytoplasmic bivalent, i.e., the microtubule density in the vicinity of the bivalent is much greater than in other cytoplasmic regions. This microtubule population cannot be accounted for solely by kinetochore nucleation and/or capture of microtubules. Furthermore, the mini-spindles frequently form at odd angles to the main spindle, so that at least one pole has no relationship to the poles of the main spindle. We conclude that a bivalent, or factors that become associated with the bivalent as a result of the manipulation, can either stabilize microtubules or promote their assembly. The bivalent activates latent microtubule organizing centers, or alternatively, polar organizing material has been passively transported from the main spindle to the cytoplasm by the micromanipulation procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3098743      PMCID: PMC2114567          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  16 in total

1.  Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Staehly
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Computer measurements and graphics of three-dimensional cellular ultrastructure.

Authors:  P B Moens; T Moens
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1981-05

3.  A model for the microtubule organizing activity of the centrosomes and kinetochores in mammalian cells.

Authors:  M De Brabander
Journal:  Cell Biol Int Rep       Date:  1982-10

4.  Monoclonal antibodies to mitotic cells.

Authors:  F M Davis; T Y Tsao; S K Fowler; P N Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Non-spindle microtubule organizing centers in metaphase II-arrested mouse oocytes.

Authors:  B Maro; S K Howlett; M Webb
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The prometaphase-I kinetochore microtubule bundle and kinetochore orientation in males.

Authors:  K Church; H P Lin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 7.  Genetics of microtubule systems.

Authors:  E C Raff
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays, as studied by the injection of centrosomes and nuclei into Xenopus eggs.

Authors:  E Karsenti; J Newport; R Hubble; M Kirschner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai; T S Hays
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Tubulin assembly sites and the organization of cytoplasmic microtubules in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  B R Brinkley; S M Cox; D A Pepper; L Wible; S L Brenner; R L Pardue
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  21 in total

1.  Morphological Plasticity of the Mitotic Apparatus in Plants and Its Developmental Consequences.

Authors:  B. A. Palevitz
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Kinetochore-microtubule interactions during cell division.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Claudio E Sunkel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Plant neocentromeres: fast, focused, and driven.

Authors:  R Kelly Dawe; Evelyn N Hiatt
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Micromanipulation of Chromosomes in Insect Spermatocytes.

Authors:  Nicolas K H Lin; Ryder Nance; Jane Szybist; Alan Cheville; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  fumble encodes a pantothenate kinase homolog required for proper mitosis and meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Afshar; P Gönczy; S DiNardo; S A Wasserman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sperm chromatin acquires an activity that induces microtubule assembly during residence in the cytoplasm of metaphase oocytes of the mouse.

Authors:  W Harrouk; H J Clarke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Spindle fusion requires dynein-mediated sliding of oppositely oriented microtubules.

Authors:  Jesse C Gatlin; Alexandre Matov; Aaron C Groen; Daniel J Needleman; Thomas J Maresca; Gaudenz Danuser; Timothy J Mitchison; E D Salmon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein.

Authors:  W E Theurkauf; R S Hawley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Influence of M-phase chromatin on the anisotropy of microtubule asters.

Authors:  M Dogterom; M A Félix; C C Guet; S Leibler
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle self-organization and cytokinesis during male meiosis in asterless mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Bonaccorsi; M G Giansanti; M Gatti
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-08-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.