Literature DB >> 4025173

Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.

G A Williams, A J Labovitz.   

Abstract

One hundred thirty-four patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic heart valves were investigated with Doppler echocardiography to determine normal values for commonly used prosthetic valves and to test the specificity of abnormal Doppler findings. In 70 patients the aortic valves had been replaced and in 64 the mitral valves had been replaced. Gradients across prostheses in the aortic position were calculated from maximal velocity. Peak calculated aortic transvalvular gradients in normal subjects were 22 +/- 10 mm Hg in 33 Björk-Shiley valves, 23 +/- 10 mm Hg in 27 porcine valves and 29 +/- 13 mm Hg in 6 Starr-Edwards valves. Mild aortic regurgitation was seen in 42% of Björk-Shiley valves, 26% of porcine valves and 2 of 6 Starr-Edwards valves. Mitral valve orifice was calculated by the pressure half-time method. In clinically normal patients with mitral valve prostheses, the effective mitral valve orifice was 2.5 +/- 0.8 cm2 in 35 Björk-Shiley valves, 2.1 +/- 0.7 cm2 in 17 porcine valves, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 cm2 in 10 Starr-Edwards valves. Mitral regurgitation was found in 11% of Björk-Shiley valves, 19% of porcine valves and 30% of Starr-Edwards valves. Repeat studies at 2 weeks to 14 months revealed no difference in 8 aortic and 14 mitral prostheses. Seven aortic and 4 mitral valves functioned abnormally as determined by Doppler, and the abnormal function was confirmed in each at surgery or at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4025173     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90858-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the function of prosthetic mitral valves.

Authors:  J Chambers; G Jackson; D Jewitt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-03

2.  Doppler echocardiographic characteristics of normal and dysfunctioning prosthetic valves in the tricuspid and mitral position.

Authors:  M Pye; N Weerasana; W H Bain; I Hutton; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-01

3.  Doppler measurement of cardiac output across prosthetic mitral valves.

Authors:  H Dittmann; W Voelker; K R Karsch; L Seipel
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-03-05

Review 4.  Oesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  E J Gussenhoven; M A Taams; J Roelandt; K Bom; J Honkoop; N de Jong; K M Ligtvoet
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1987

5.  Echocardiographic assessment of artificial heart valves: British Society of Echocardiography position paper.

Authors:  J Chambers; A Fraser; P Lawford; P Nihoyannopoulos; I Simpson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-04

6.  Non-invasive assessment by Doppler ultrasound of 155 patients with bioprosthetic valves: a comparison of the Wessex porcine, low profile Ionescu-Shiley, and Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.

Authors:  I A Simpson; I J Reece; A B Houston; I Hutton; D J Wheatley; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-07

7.  Left ventricular dynamics after aortic valve replacement: a long-term, combined radionuclide angiographic and ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  C S Masotti; P Bonfranceschi; G Rusticali; F Rusticali; A Pierangeli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1992
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.