Literature DB >> 4017746

Strand breaks arising from the repair of the 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted template and methyl methanesulphonate-induced lesions can explain the formation of sister chromatid exchanges.

R Saffhill, C H Ockey.   

Abstract

5-Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) are mainly determined during replication on a BrdU-substituted template. The BrdU, once incorporated, is rapidly excised as uracil (U), and the gap is repaired with the incorporation of BrdU from the medium, which leads to further repair. During the second S period in BrdU medium, this process continues as the strand acts as template. Experiments suggest that 3-aminobenzamide (3AB) delays the ligation of the gaps formed after U excision, resulting in enhanced SCE levels during the second cycle of BrdU incorporation. When normal templates of G1 cells are treated before BrdU introduction with methyl methanesulphonate (MMS), 3AB in the first cycle doubles the MMS-induced SCEs but has no effect on them during the second cycle. When the BrdU-substituted template is treated with MMS in G1 of the second cycle, 3AB again doubles the SCEs due to MMS and also enhances the SCEs resulting from delays in ligation of the gaps following U excision in the BrdU-substituted template. The repair processes of MMS lesions that are sensitive to 3AB and lead to SCEs take place rapidly, while the repair process of late repairing lesions that lead to SCEs appear to be insensitive to 3AB. A model for SCE induction is proposed involving a single-strand break or gap as the initial requirement for SCE initiation at the replicating fork. Subsequent events represent natural stages in the repair process of a lesion, ensuring replication without loss of genetic information.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4017746     DOI: 10.1007/bf00348697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  33 in total

1.  A new hypothesis for the interpretation of chromatid aberrations, and its relevance to theories for the mode of action of chemical agents.

Authors:  S H REVELL
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1958-04-24       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Two forms of repair in the DNA of human cells damaged by chemical carcinogens and mutagens.

Authors:  J D Regan; R B Setlow
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The effect of cell proliferation, bromodeoxyuridine concentration, and deoxynucleoside triphosphate pools on sister chromatid exchange induction.

Authors:  C H Ockey; R Saffhill; J A Booth
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1984

4.  Aphidicolin prevents mitotic cell division by interfering with the activity of DNA polymerase-alpha.

Authors:  S Ikegami; T Taguchi; M Ohashi; M Oguro; H Nagano; Y Mano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cytological detection of mutagen-carcinogen exposure by sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  P Perry; H J Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Induction of sister chromatid exchange by 3-aminobenzamide is independent of bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  W F Morgan; S Wolff
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1984

7.  Frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges depending on the amount of 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporated into parental DNA.

Authors:  H Suzuki; T H Yosida
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  The mechanism of 3-aminobenzamide-mediated increases in spontaneous and induced SCEs.

Authors:  J L Schwartz; R R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1984

9.  Inability of Chinese hamster ovary cells to excise O6-alkylguanine.

Authors:  R Goth-Goldstein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Role of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) in deoxyribonucleic acid repair in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  M R James; A R Lehmann
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1982-08-17       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  22 in total

1.  Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effect of bromodeoxyuridine on the proliferation and growth of ethyl methanesulfonate-exposed P3 cells: relationship to the induction of sister-chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  S M Morris; O E Domon; L J McGarrity; R L Kodell; D A Casciano
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 6.691

4.  Measurement of in vivo proliferation in human colorectal mucosa using bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  C S Potten; M Kellett; S A Roberts; D A Rew; G D Wilson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Different effects of bromodeoxyuridine and [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA on cell proliferation, position, and fate.

Authors:  Alvaro Duque; Pasko Rakic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dose-response function for Painter's SCE-model.

Authors:  G A Schachtel; W Köhler
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Coordination of DNA single strand break repair.

Authors:  Rachel Abbotts; David M Wilson
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Discrimination of two fibroblast progenitor populations in early explant cultures of hamster gingiva.

Authors:  C A McCulloch; G Knowles
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Targeted therapies in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nicanor I Barrena Medel; Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  DNA polymerases as potential therapeutic targets for cancers deficient in the DNA mismatch repair proteins MSH2 or MLH1.

Authors:  Sarah A Martin; Nuala McCabe; Michelle Mullarkey; Robert Cummins; Darren J Burgess; Yusaku Nakabeppu; Sugako Oka; Elaine Kay; Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 31.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.