Literature DB >> 3995490

Spinal cord compression in breast cancer.

K M Harrison, H B Muss, M R Ball, M McWhorter, D Case.   

Abstract

Myelography was performed on 78 patients with breast cancer who had signs or symptoms compatible with spinal cord compression. Of 42 patients (54%) with extradural defects, 21 (50%) had a complete block. All patients with positive myelograms (M+) had a positive bone scan and 41 of 42 (97%) had positive skeletal x-rays. Except for paraplegia, paraparesis, or a sensory level abnormality, signs and symptoms were usually not precise enough to accurately predict patients with cord lesions; however, back pain, paresthesias, and bladder or bowel dysfunction were significantly more common in M+ patients. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein was elevated in almost all M+ patients but also in approximately half of the M- group. Cytology and glucose analysis of CSF were not of value in predicting cord involvement. Response to treatment was better for patients with fewer sites of metastatic disease and a shorter time from diagnosis to treatment. There was no notable difference in survival between M+ and M- patients. Myelography remains the most precise tool for diagnosing spinal cord lesions. Unfortunately, the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer is poor regardless of whether spinal cord compression is present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3995490     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850615)55:12<2839::aid-cncr2820551222>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Early diagnosis and treatment of spinal epidural metastasis in breast cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  W Boogerd; J J van der Sande; R Kröger
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Epidural extension of vertebral metastases is not an independent predictor of prognosis after therapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Federico Ampil; Kent Broussard; Moiz Vora
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Surgical management of vertebral neoplasia: who, when, how and why?

Authors:  S J Krikler; D S Marks; A G Thompson; W F Merriam; D Spooner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of spinal metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  F E Landreneau; R J Landreneau; R J Keenan; P F Ferson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P D Brown; S L Stafford; S E Schild; J A Martenson; D Schiff
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Metastatic spinal cord compression--options for surgical treatment.

Authors:  J D Rompe; P Eysel; C Hopf; J Heine
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Surgical treatment strategies and outcome in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the spine: a review of 87 patients.

Authors:  Joseph A Shehadi; Daniel M Sciubba; Ian Suk; Dima Suki; Marcos V C Maldaun; Ian E McCutcheon; Remi Nader; Richard Theriault; Laurence D Rhines; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ian Suk; Dima Suki; Marcos V C Maldaun; Ian E McCutcheon; Remi Nader; Richard Theriault; Laurence D Rhines; Joseph A Shehadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spinal cord compression in breast cancer: a review of 70 cases.

Authors:  M E Hill; M A Richards; W M Gregory; P Smith; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.