Literature DB >> 7532537

Surgical management of vertebral neoplasia: who, when, how and why?

S J Krikler1, D S Marks, A G Thompson, W F Merriam, D Spooner.   

Abstract

To determine the role of surgery in vertebral neoplasia, we conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing surgery for vertebral neoplasia in the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, and Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital, Coventry. Surgery included decompression, stabilisation or both. The neurological status was assessed by Frankel grading before and after surgery. Of 70 patients undergoing surgery, 14 were neurologically intact preoperatively, and a further 25 were weak but ambulatory. Following surgery, 35 were intact, and a further 22 were ambulatory. Sixty-six patients (94%) obtained good pain relief. Survival correlated with histology and younger age at presentation, but not with level, neurology at presentation or type of surgery. We conclude that neurological status, pain relief and mechanical stability are better after appropriate surgery than after radiotherapy or inappropriate surgery. Failure to consider the surgical option may deny the chance of significant neurological recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7532537     DOI: 10.1007/bf02200148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  The role of vertebral body collapse in the management of malignant spinal cord compression.

Authors:  G F Findlay
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Surgical management of metastatic renal carcinoma of the spine.

Authors:  G J King; J P Kostuik; R J McBroom; W Richardson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Synchronous vertebral decompression and posterior stabilization in the treatment of spinal malignancy.

Authors:  F G Johnston; D Uttley; H T Marsh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Surgical decompression of anterior and posterior malignant epidural tumors compressing the spinal cord: a prospective study.

Authors:  T Siegal; T Siegal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

Authors:  F Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Spinal metastases. A retrospective survey from a general hospital.

Authors:  R J Stark; R A Henson; S J Evans
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  The results of decompression of cord or cauda equina compression from metastatic extradural tumors.

Authors:  A Nather; K Bose
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine as a treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal cord compression from metastatic malignancy.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Surgical treatment of metastatic tumors of the spine.

Authors:  S Manabe; A Tateishi; M Abe; T Ohno
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Spinal instability secondary to metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Galasko
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.