Literature DB >> 17406908

Surgical treatment strategies and outcome in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the spine: a review of 87 patients.

Joseph A Shehadi1, Daniel M Sciubba, Ian Suk, Dima Suki, Marcos V C Maldaun, Ian E McCutcheon, Remi Nader, Richard Theriault, Laurence D Rhines, Ziya L Gokaslan.   

Abstract

Aggressive surgical management of spinal metastatic disease can provide improvement of neurological function and significant pain relief. However, there is limited literature analyzing such management as is pertains to individual histopathology of the primary tumor, which may be linked to overall prognosis for the patient. In this study, clinical outcomes were reviewed for patients undergoing spinal surgery for metastatic breast cancer. Respective review was done to identify all patients with breast cancer over an eight-year period at a major cancer center and then to select those with symptomatic spinal metastatic disease who underwent spinal surgery. Pre- and postoperative pain levels (visual analog scale [VAS]), analgesic medication usage, and modified Frankel grade scores were compared on all patients who underwent surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess risks for complications. A total of 16,977 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 479 patients (2.8%) were diagnosed with spinal metastases from breast cancer. Of these patients, 87 patients (18%) underwent 125 spinal surgeries. Of the 76 patients (87%) who were ambulatory preoperatively, the majority (98%) were still ambulatory. Of the 11 patients (13%) who were nonambulatory preoperatively, four patients were alive at 3 months postoperatively, three of which (75%) regained ambulation. The preoperative median VAS of six was significantly reduced to a median score of two at the time of discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.001 for all time points). A total of 39% of patients experienced complications; 87% were early (within 30 days of surgery), and 13% were late. Early major surgical complications were significantly greater when five or more levels were instrumented. In patients with spinal metastases specifically from breast cancer, aggressive surgical management provides significant pain relief and preservation or improvement of neurological function with an acceptably low rate of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17406908      PMCID: PMC2200772          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0357-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  50 in total

Review 1.  The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor.

Authors:  M H Bilsky; E Lis; J Raizer; H Lee; P Boland
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  1999

2.  Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Roy A Patchell; Phillip A Tibbs; William F Regine; Richard Payne; Stephen Saris; Richard J Kryscio; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Byron Young
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 20-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Use of "MAPs" for determining the optimal surgical approach to metastatic disease of the thoracolumbar spine: anterior, posterior, or combined. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-01

Review 4.  Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: what to expect in 2001 and beyond.

Authors:  F J Esteva; V Valero; L Pusztai; L Boehnke-Michaud; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2001

5.  Spinal-pelvic fixation in patients with lumbosacral neoplasms.

Authors:  R J Jackson; Z L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Spinal radiation before surgical decompression adversely affects outcomes of surgery for symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Z Ghogawala; F L Mansfield; L F Borges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  B Weigel; M Maghsudi; C Neumann; R Kretschmer; F J Müller; M Nerlich
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors for pain control and quality of life.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Degen; Gregory J Gagnon; Jean-Marc Voyadzis; Donald A McRae; Michael Lunsden; Sonja Dieterich; Inge Molzahn; Fraser C Henderson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-05

Review 9.  Cyberknife radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors.

Authors:  Peter C Gerszten; William C Welch
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients.

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney; Donald F Schomer; Remi Nader; Jennifer Chlan-Fourney; Dima Suki; Kamran Ahrar; Laurence D Rhines; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  20 in total

1.  Prolonged survival following aggressive treatment for metastatic breast cancer in the spine.

Authors:  Patricia L Zadnik; Lee Hwang; Derek G Ju; Mari L Groves; Jackson Sui; Alp Yurter; Timothy F Witham; Ali Bydon; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Quality of life, pain, and psychological factors in patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spine.

Authors:  Francesca Luzzati; Emanuele Maria Giusti; Gennaro Maria Scotto; Giuseppe Perrucchini; Luca Cannavò; Gianluca Castelnuovo; Andrea Colonna Cottini
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Risk factors for major complications in surgery for hypervascular spinal tumors: an analysis of 120 cases with adjuvant preoperative embolization.

Authors:  Benqiang Tang; Tao Ji; Xiaodong Tang; Long Jin; Sen Dong; Wei Guo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Diagnosis and surgical management of breast cancer metastatic to the spine.

Authors:  Derek G Ju; Alp Yurter; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Trends in survival after surgery for breast cancer metastatic to the brain and spinal column in medicare patients: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Kevin S Cahill; John H Chi; Art L Day; Elizabeth B Claus
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroshi Uei; Masashi Oshima; Yasumitsu Ajiro
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

7.  Independent predictors of complication following surgery for spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Darryl Lau; Matthew R Leach; Khoi D Than; John Ziewacz; Frank La Marca; Paul Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Is surgery for spine metastasis reasonable in patients older than 60 years?

Authors:  Tangzhao Liang; Yong Wan; Xuenong Zou; Xinsheng Peng; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Skeletal metastases from breast cancer: pathogenesis of bone tropism and treatment strategy.

Authors:  Caterina Fontanella; Valentina Fanotto; Karim Rihawi; Giuseppe Aprile; Fabio Puglisi
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?

Authors:  Brian P Chen; Katie Garland; Darren M Roffey; Stephane Poitras; Geoffrey Dervin; Peter Lapner; Philippe Phan; Eugene K Wai; Stephen P Kingwell; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.