Literature DB >> 3989475

Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).

M R D'Amato, D P Salmon, M Colombo.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, 8 monkeys, experimentally naive with regard to visual stimuli, were trained on identity matching with a two-sample set based on two-dimensional stimuli. On a subsequent test employing two new samples, 4 of the 8 applied the matching rule to the new sample stimuli (as defined by our transfer criterion), and 3 showed substantial savings in learning to match the new samples. Two of these 3 transferred the matching rule when given a second test with two new samples, and the third showed immediate and complete transfer when tested with a third pair of new stimuli. These results indicate a much stronger representation of the matching concept in monkeys than in pigeons, even when the conditions of assessment are reasonably comparable. In Experiment 2, however, 4 monkeys from Experiment 1 failed to transfer the matching rule to steady versus flashing green samples, indicating that the matching concept did not immediately extend beyond the general class of visual stimuli with which it was developed. These and related results in the literature suggest that representation of the matching concept in animals varies along a specificity-abstractness dimension, reflecting the degree to which the concept is tied to the conditions and context of its development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3989475     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.11.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  20 in total

1.  The effects of superior temporal cortex lesions on the processing and retention of auditory information in monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  M Colombo; H R Rodman; C G Gross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Abstract numerical discrimination learning in rats.

Authors:  Tohru Taniuchi; Junko Sugihara; Mariko Wakashima; Makiko Kamijo
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2007-01-01

6.  On the limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  M R D'Amato; M Colombo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: Relational matching and working memory.

Authors:  J David Smith; Brooke N Jackson; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

8.  Cognitive abilities in Malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): matching-to-sample and image/mirror-image discriminations.

Authors:  Stefanie Gierszewski; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  L A Parr; J T Winslow; W D Hopkins; F B de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion.

Authors:  W J McIlvane; J B Kledaras; L C Munson; K A King; J C de Rose; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.