Literature DB >> 3981085

Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.

L T DeCarlo.   

Abstract

Pigeons were offered choices between a variable-time schedule that arranged reinforcers throughout the session and a variable-time schedule that arranged reinforcers only when the pigeon was spending time on it. The subjects could maximize the overall rate of reinforcement in this situation by biasing their time allocation towards the latter schedule. This arrangement provides an alternative to concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules for testing whether animals maximize overall rates or match relative rates, and has the advantage of being free of the asymmetrical response requirements present with those schedules. The results were contrary to those predicted by maximizing: The bias it predicts did not appear.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3981085      PMCID: PMC1348096          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.

Authors:  J M Ziriax; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Melioration, matching, and maximization.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio?

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.

Authors:  L Green; H Rachlin; J Hanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Is there a decisive test between matching and maximizing?

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green; B Tormey
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate.

Authors:  G M Heyman; L Tanz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Income maximizing on concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D Shurtleff; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Maximizing versus matching on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  S A Vyse; T W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of response-allocation constraints on multiple-schedule performance.

Authors:  M Davison; L Charman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.

Authors:  G M Heyman; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  H I Savastano; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  When does reward maximization lead to matching law?

Authors:  Yutaka Sakai; Tomoki Fukai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.