Literature DB >> 16812610

Income maximizing on concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.

D Shurtleff, A Silberberg.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effect of food availability on pigeons' choice behavior under concurrent schedules of reinforcement. In Experiment 1, 3 pigeons earned their daily food ration by choosing, in 30-min sessions, between concurrent variable-ratio 30 variable-interval 40-s schedules. Food presentations during both schedules lasted 2 or 12 s, depending upon the condition. Relative variable-ratio response rate was inversely related to hopper duration. In Experiment 2, 4 pigeons received their daily feeding by responding on the same schedule pair as in Experiment 1 (with 4-s food presentations) in sessions that varied in length from 10 to 30 min, depending on the condition. The length of a vertical slit projected on a response key increased with time so that "passage of time" might be more easily discriminable. As session duration decreased, relative variable-ratio response rate increased. In Experiment 3, 4 pigeons chose between two variable-interval 40-s schedules. One schedule operated without regard to the schedule selected, whereas the other operated only when the subject responded in its presence (dependent). Although these schedules had the same feedback function, preference for the dependent variable interval increased as session duration decreased from 30 to 10 min. The preference changes in these studies reveal the operation of an income-maximizing process in choice.

Year:  1990        PMID: 16812610      PMCID: PMC1323012          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.

Authors:  J M Ziriax; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  A Silberberg; F R Warren-Boulton; T Asano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Income maximizing in concurrent interval-ratio schedules.

Authors:  T Sakagami; S R Hursh; J Christensen; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio?

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.

Authors:  G M Heyman; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.

Authors:  L T DeCarlo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.

Authors:  J J Widholm; A Silberberg; S R Hursh; A A Imam; F R Warren-Boulton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models?

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Derek D Reed
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2009

Review 3.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

4.  Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Maximizing versus matching on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  S A Vyse; T W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration and drug abuse policy.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Stock optimizing: maximizing reinforcers per session on a variable-interval schedule.

Authors:  A Silberberg; R Bauman; S Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Human choice on concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J R Thomas; N Berendzen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.