Literature DB >> 16812469

Effects of response-allocation constraints on multiple-schedule performance.

M Davison, L Charman.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained on multiple variable-interval schedules in which components alternated after a fixed number of responses had been emitted. In Part 1, each component change occurred after 20 responses; in Part 2, the number was 40; and in Part 3, the number of responses before change was 10. Component reinforcer rates were varied over five experimental conditions in each of Parts 1 to 3. Component response rates decreased as the specified number of responses per component was increased. However, the relation between component response-rate ratios and component reinforcer-rate ratios was independent of the specified number of responses per component, and was similar to that found when components alternate after fixed time periods. In the fourth part of the experiment, the results from Parts 1 to 3 were systematically replicated by keeping the component reinforcer rates constant, but different, while the number of responses that produced component alternation was varied from 5 to 60 responses. The results showed that multiple-schedule performance under component-response-number constraint is similar to that under conventional component-duration constraint. They further suggest that multiple-schedule response rates are controlled by component reinforcer rates and not by principles of maximizing overall reinforcer rates or meliorating component reinforcer rates.

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812469      PMCID: PMC1348295          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  L Charman; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Multiple and concurrent schedule performance: independence from concurrent and successive schedule contexts.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast as differential time allocation.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Multiple schedule component duration: a reanalysis of Shimp and Wheatley (1971) and Todorov (1972).

Authors:  E L Edmon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.

Authors:  D G Lander; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Matching and maximizing with variable-time schedules.

Authors:  L T DeCarlo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior.

Authors:  W Vaughan; H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contrast and undermatching with regular or irregular alternation of components.

Authors:  A P McLean; C F Morritt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dissociation of value and response strength.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.